Local towns say ‘no’ to the laws of war and indefinite detention.
Jason Casella (The Pontiac Tribune) — Who is PANDA? We are not an institution, we are a people. We are not an organization, we are a movement. We are not a group, a tribe, a flock, or a crowd. We are individuals, and city by city, county by county, state by state, and nation by nation, we are taking back our future. We are People Against the NDAA, and tyranny… stops… here.
Why is the NDAA is unconstitutional? Constitutional lawyer Krisanne Hall explains in her breakdown, because it was written so vague that it could be applied to anyone. Undefined terms such as “belligerent act” and “associated forces” leave all doors open for interpretation.
The NDAA violates Article I, Section 9- suspension clause, Article III, Section 2- grand jury indictment, Article III, Section 3- Treason, 1st amendment-free speech , 2nd amendment -right to bear arms, 4th amendment -secure in persons and papers, 5th amendment- due process, 6th amendment- speedy trial , and 8th amendment- cruel and unusual punishment.
We didn’t stop the Patriot Act which said our stuff can be taken without due process, now we have the NDAA which says they can take us without due process. This is why we must stop this now.
http://pontiactribune.com/indefinite-detention-a-legitimate-threat/