Archive for July, 2015

Friday, July 03, 2015

Following last week’s controversial U.S. Supreme Court rulings on Obamacare and gay marriage, voters believe more strongly that individual states should have the right to turn their backs on the federal courts.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 33% of Likely U.S. Voters now believe that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if their elected officials agree with them. That’s up nine points from 24% when we first asked this question in February.  Just over half (52%) disagree, down from 58% in the earlier survey. Fifteen percent (15%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Perhaps even more disturbing is that the voters who feel strongest about overriding the federal courts – Republicans and conservatives – are those who traditionally have been the most supportive of the Constitution and separation of powers. During the Obama years, however, these voters have become increasingly suspicious and even hostile toward the federal government.

Fifty percent (50%) of GOP voters now believe states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings, compared to just 22% of Democrats and 30% of voters not affiliated with either major party. Interestingly, this represents a noticeable rise in support among all three groups.

Fifty percent (50%) of conservative voters share this view, but just 27% of moderates and 15% of liberals agree.

Voters are closely divided in their opinions of both of last week’s major rulings. Negative views of the Supreme Court are at their highest level in nearly nine years of regular surveying. Positive opinions are also up to a less dramatic three-year high.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it’s in the news, it’s in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

The survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted on June 30-July 1, 2015 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

Earlier this year, 26% of voters told Rasmussen Reports that President Obama should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if they are standing in the way of actions he feels are important for the country. Forty-three percent (43%) of Democrats shared this belief, while 81% of Republicans and 67% of unaffiliated voters disagreed.

The more a voter approves of Obama’s performance, the more likely he or she is to say that states should not have the right to ignore the federal courts.

Higher income voters are more likely to oppose letting states ignore federal court rulings than those who earn less.

Support for ignoring the federal courts is up among most demographic groups, however.

Most voters have long believed that the Supreme Court justices have their own political agenda,  and they still tend to feel that that agenda is more liberal than conservative.

A plurality (47%) of voters continues to believe the federal government has too much influence over state governments, and 54% think states should have the right to opt out of federal government programs that they don’t agree with.  Even more (61%) think states should have the right to opt out of federally mandated programs if the federal government doesn’t help pay for them.

The Declaration of Independence, the foundational document that Americans honor on the Fourth of July, says that governments derive their authority from the consent of the governed, but just 25% believe that to be true of the federal government today.

Only 20% now consider the federal government a protector of individual liberty.  Sixty percent (60%) see the government as a threat to individual liberty instead.

source

Federal government is currently crafting a mandate that would require all new vehicles to “talk” to each other continuously. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration plans to submit their proposed “connected car” rule by the end of this year.

Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication technology has been developed by top automakers over the past decade and is ready for commercialization. It uses a combination of Wi-Fi, GPS data, and sensor data collected by the vehicle to transmit a signal on speed and position 10 times a second.

Like so many technologies, V2V is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it has great potential to reduce car crashes, which claim 37,000 lives a year in the U.S. It also means that your driving data will be broadcast openly, making it easy for interested parties to intercept this information.

“V2V ups privacy concerns because it essentially broadcasts a vehicle’s location and speed, as well as some information about where a vehicle has been previously, to anyone within range. And while Department of Transportation officials told the GAO that “V2V communication security system would contain multiple technical, physical, and organizational controls to minimize privacy risks—including the risk of vehicle tracking by individuals and government or commercial entities,” regulating who can use V2V data and for what would fall outside the Department of Transportation’s span of control. It would essentially require legislation by Congress.”

Considering the mass surveillance being carried out by the National Security Agency and other agencies, it is highly unlikely that authorities would ignore this potent source of information. Local governments could use the data to track those they consider “bad actors.”

“Vehicle owners need to know that companies or local governments won’t be able to use the data from V2V to track cars like website users, and that is going to be a hard sell in this post-Snowden world.”

The surveillance state would not be the only potential threat to connected drivers. Hackers have already demonstrated the ability to tamper with braking, speed, steering, and dashboard displays in the Toyota Prius and Ford Escape.

Not to mention, the government database containing personal information on every government employee was just compromised by hackers; not some, but every single federal employee was compromised. They can’t even protect their own data, still think they can protect yours?

The prospect of connected cars brings many exciting possibilities. They are the first crucial step toward vehicles that can drive themselves. They will link to your apps and smart devices, tailoring the driving experience for you and helping to plan your day. They will reduce crashes and cut down on congestion by talking to sensors in the road system.

However, a central authority mandating its use on a certain date will stifle the full potential.  V2V chnology should grow on a voluntary basis through free market mechanisms. This way, measures to protect the individual from government surveillance and hackers can grow organically through consumer demand.

Robert Gore's avatarSTRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

A good article for July 4, from Justin Raimondo at antiwar.org:

As we celebrate Independence Day, honoring the American colonists’ successful fight to be free of the British crown and establish their own sovereign state, it is instructive to note that the US is, today, the greatest enemy of sovereignty on earth. When the British surrendered at Yorktown, the redcoat band played “The World Turned Upside Down,” in recognition of the overthrow of the Old Order and the inauguration of the New. As we enter the Bizarro World of the twenty-first century, however, one notes with a mixture of sadness and outrage that things have been turned on their heads once again, and the Old Order is back with a vengeance.

This historical inversion began in the wake of World War II, when the US emerged as the preeminent world power, taking the title from the British, who were in…

View original post 699 more words

More Outstanding Craftsmanship From Bill

Posted: July 4, 2015 by gamegetterII in Uncategorized

Aromatic Cedar

Magnetic latch, with Brass hinges.
Nice little Box with removable tray.
Clear finished with water based urethane, completely raw on the interior. Ooh that smell. It is wonderful.
Help me make my shop smell so wonderful for a few days wont you? Order something from Cedar. anything you like.

Via David Codrea

The fallout from two recent Supreme Court rulings is receiving needed attention, as it’s up to activist gun owners to keep apprised of looming threats and opportunities, and to minimize damage/maximize gains of case outcomes. For one decision, Gun Owners of America has been at the forefront of warning against the anti-gun dangers hidden in Obamacare. On the flip side, some are looking at the same sex marriage ruling to prompt states to recognize concealed carry permits. But as important as those concerns are, they may ultimately become moot points if a case SCOTUS declined to hear is an indicator of things to come . . .

“The Supreme Court … refused to accept a case which sought to allow states to supplement a federal voter registration form so as to require proof of citizenship to vote,” Legal Insurrection reported Monday. “This is not just a battle of forms. It’s a battle for preventing theft of elections.”

“A new study … indicated that 6.4 percent of all non-citizens voted illegally in the 2008 presidential election, and 2.2 percent in the 2010 midterm,” National Review reported in November. “Given that 80 percent of non-citizens lean Democratic … Al Franken’s 312-vote win in the 2008 Minnesota U.S. Senate race [is] one likely tipped by non-citizen voting.”

While Obamacare is cited as a law that was passed by adding Franken’s 60th vote to the total, his hostility to gun rights and his affirmation of anti-gun nominees to administration and federal court positions were also enabled by his questionable win. A co-sponsor of the “Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act,” which called for up to a 10-year prison sentence for violations, Franken is rated “F” by both the National Rifle Association and Gun Owners of America.

Still, the High Court’s deliberate indifference may have been based on recognizing that ascertaining proof of citizenship may itself soon be a moot point if establishment Democrats and Republicans have their way. That’s because the Obama administration is paving a “pathway to citizenship” for foreign nationals illegally residing in the U.S. Likely Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has pledged that as a priority. And GOP leadership and current flip-flopping frontrunner Jeb Bush are servicing their Chamber of Commerce patrons to ensure a continued source of “cheap” (meaning paid for by everyone else) labor.

Add to that an overlooked but undeniable danger identified by activist and journalist Rick Oltman in an exclusive report the media and political establishments have ignored, but that merits widespread attention: Expect a “massive naturalization of legal permanent residents [LPRs] before the 2016 election,” a move that will overwhelmingly favor Democrats.

That’s especially dangerous, because the Democrat Party includes “gun control” as a central part of its national platform:

Read the rest @ http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2015/07/david-codrea/case-scotus-didnt-hear-points-to-larger-concern-for-gun-owners/

| Jul 3, 2015

Every year on this day we are reminded of the significance of our independence.  We are told the timeless story of 56 men who pledged their lives and sacred honor, knowing they would be hung as traitors for daring to believe that they could be free men.  The story of American independence is one that for many of us, embodies all that we believe about our nation and about ourselves.  It fills us with pride, with hope, with love for our country.

This post is not a retelling of that story.

Instead, I’d like to direct your attention to our present.  After two hundred and thirty-eight years, what have we done with our independence?  Have we guarded with jealous attention the jewel of liberty, as Patrick Henry admonished us?  Have we remembered that “patriotism is as much a virtue as justice,” as Benjamin Rush reminded us?  Have we all studied politics and war, as John Adams did, to protect our children’s freedom to study mathematics and philosophy? Above all, have we remained mindful as a collective nation that “those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it,” as Thomas Paine warned us?

Back then only 3% of the colonists took up arms against the tyrannical English government. Now, do we even have that many people willing to stand up? In order to understand the price of freedom, to understand the grave and critical responsibility that we have as guardians of our own liberty, we must be educated about history, about conflict and truth and character. We must understand the events that led up to that fateful decision made by those 56 men. We must know about a lot more than celebrities and athletes and fashion and the price of weed in our area. Unfortunately, we are far, far behind both our allies and our enemies in all of that and more.

In this country, 14% of American adults cannot read. Another 21% read at a 5th grade level. Even more staggering is that 19% of the high school graduates each year cannot read, adding to the total number of illiterate. How can we claim that we “study politics and war” when as a nation, so many of our citizens cannot even read English (not even counting the millions of illegals in this country who will never learn English)? And what of those who can? A 2004 study found that half of all American adults between 18 and 44 do not read books for pleasure. As a result, “reading comprehension skills are eroding.” As Twain pointed out, “The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.” An uneducated man is an easily enslaved one, and we see this all over today in the hordes of goverment-dependent, in the shallow masses who subscribe to empty liberal philosophies and childlike emotionalism, in the absolute lack of critical thinking skills among our fellow Americans.

As a nation, we are horribly undereducated in all of the areas that matter. I’m not even talking about knowing the capitals of obscure third world countries, I’m talking about knowing how the United States came to be; her faults and her strengths, the character of the men who gave their all so that we could live in liberty. We claim to be grateful and thankful but are we? So many Americans don’t know enough to be grateful. The really horrifying part is, we don’t even care.

And where is our courage? When did the traits of bravery and integrity get so perverted that we actually expect and accept lies and corruption from our own elected officials? When did American exceptionalism become a dirty concept to be ridiculed and mocked? When did being a patriot become synonymous with terrorism? The answer is simple: We let this happen. We have lounged in the water, ignoring the temperature as it rose. We watched, docile and compliant, as our liberty was taken from us one piece at a time, by presidents and Congresses led by both sides of the aisle. Uneducated and shallow, we believed what we were told. It’s to keep you safe. It’s for your own good. As a nation, we don’t know any better. In fact, we have learned through decades of slow, steady indoctrination to mistrust those who call on us to stand up for freedom. We have learned to ridicule them, to call them racists. We have even learned that maybe perhaps it would be better if all of those people weren’t in our society. It has gotten so bad that for those few of us who get it, the idea that we could be arrested and imprisoned by our own government—for nothing more than believing in and acting in the cause of liberty—is a sickening knowledge that sits in the pit of our stomach every single day.

The state of our society is pathetic, the flame of liberty is dying in the blackness of tyranny, and yet we do nothing. We have a president hell-bent on the destruction of all that was intended with that first document, a Congress who by-and-large has no intention of stopping him, and a Supreme Court that can only be trusted to uphold the Constitutional intent about half the time. We are under surveillance everywhere we go, our every move and purchase cataloged and saved. We are taxed to insanity to pay for gluttonous and ill-conceived programs that should not even exist. We are told what we can grow, where we can grow it, and whether we can eat it. Our food is contaminated, our water impure, our children overmedicated. In every single facet of your life, there is government influence and control. It’s so prevalent that we don’t even pay attention to it anymore. And yet every year we get together on July 4th and praise the idea of “independence” like we have a clue what that actually was intended to mean.

Read the rest @ http://www.patrickhenrysociety.com/july-4th/

SLAPPED DOWN AGAIN:

Posted: July 3, 2015 by gamegetterII in Uncategorized

Media Hoax!!!

Posted: July 3, 2015 by gamegetterII in Uncategorized

MaddMedic's avatarFreedom Is Just Another Word...

‘Violent Right-Wing Extremist In The U.S. Are Burning Black Churches’…NOT.

Reminder: Several of the hyped hate crimes against black churches had been committed by black suspects; a significant number of the black churches were, in fact, white churches; and the complex motives behind the crimes included mental illness, vandalism and concealment of theft.

View original post

The Flags of Fascism

Posted: July 3, 2015 by gamegetterII in Uncategorized

h/t NCRenegade

Hillary’s Secret War, by Andrew P. Napolitano

Posted: July 3, 2015 by gamegetterII in Uncategorized

Robert Gore's avatarSTRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

One of these days the full story of Libya and Benghazi will emerge, thanks to people like Andrew P. Napolitano. From Napolitano, at antiwar.org:

In the course of my work at Fox News, I am often asked by colleagues to review and explain documents and statutes. Recently, in conjunction with my colleagues Catherine Herridge, our chief intelligence correspondent, and Pamela Browne, our senior executive producer, I read the transcripts of an interview Browne did with a man named Marc Turi, and Herridge asked me to review emails to and from State Department and congressional officials during the years when Hillary Clinton was the secretary of state.

What I saw has persuaded me beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty that Clinton provided material assistance to terrorists and lied to Congress in a venue where the law required her to be truthful. Here is the backstory.

Turi is a…

View original post 337 more words