According to this group of intelligence professionals, if the DNC was actually hacked, the NSA would know about it and who did it. Because the NSA has not come forward, it points to the probability of a leak, rather than a hack, that led to the WikiLeaks leaks. The leaks could have come from a DNC insider, or from an intelligence agency or the FBI, but it couldn’t have come from Russia. From VIPS at consortiumnews.com:
As the hysteria about Russia’s alleged interference in the U.S. election grows, a key mystery is why U.S. intelligence would rely on “circumstantial evidence” when it has the capability for hard evidence, say U.S. intelligence veterans.
Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
Allegations of Hacking Election Are Baseless
A New York Times report on Monday alluding to “overwhelming circumstantial evidence” leading the CIA to believe that Russian President Vladimir Putin “deployed computer hackers with…
View original post 332 more words