Archive for the ‘anti-gun idiocy’ Category

Note that there is no mention of the anti-gun asshattery that took place in Washington state,or the fact that Malloy is still gov. of Conn. Hickenlooper is still gov. of Colorado,and the two seats that the GOP won after the recall elections went to Dems, or that Cuomo is still frothing at the mouth to have his gestapo start kicking in doors because most people are ignoring the SAFE Act,Malloy is doing the same-as a whole lot of gun owners gave him the finger over the absurd “assault weapons” ban now in place.

This dumb asses have no clue what they are playing with-if they do start sending their minions to kick in gun owners doors at 4 am-people are gonna die-a lot of people-on both sides of the issue-because everyone I know is going to come out of their bedroom shooting if their door is kicked in at 4am.

These leftist idiots have no clue what they are fucking with,the shit they would start if they tried confiscating firearms.

The NRA’s news releases,updates,daily alerts-crickets about the loss of gun rights-they are spinning the elections into a gun rights victory-What The FUCK are they doing?????

We need a new gun rights group-Alan Gottleib and his Second Amendment Foundation took over JPFO-so we are left with exactly ZERO pro-gun groups who are solidly opposed to any more infringements from team .gov inc.

Not a word from NRA about the huge loss of rights in Washington-passed because the socialists/leftists/communists/and the uber rich like Bill Gates bought the votes of the Free Shit Army and the leftover hippies,tree huggers,animal “rights” whackos,and enviro nazis who have taken over the big cities.

Here’s today’s spin from the NRA…

Note this one…”Gun Control Loses, Second Amendment Wins Big In The Midterms”  WTF?????????

New Posts: November 7, 2014
Please forward this information to your family, friends, and fellow gun owners!

Mississippi Overwhelmingly Approves NRA-Backed Amendment 1

On Tuesday, voters exhibited a firm commitment to preserving the Magnolia State’s strong sporting traditions by ratifying NRA-supported Amendment 1 by a convincing 88 percent of the vote.  Amendment 1 establishes an individual constitutional right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife. Mississippi becomes the 18th state to add this important safeguard into the state’s constitution.

READ MORE

Gun Control Loses, Second Amendment Wins Big In The Midterms

One might well call it a clear denial of reality by vanquished liberals grasping for any hint that their agenda even barely survived the Republican tsunami — “it” is this wildly celebratory article on theatlantic.com boldly declaring victory for advocates of gun control in America. Given the title of the post — “The Gun Control Movement Is Learning How To Win” — you might conclude that anti-gun forces scored big in their efforts to restrict private gun ownership…that the NRA was totally humiliated on Tuesday and sent packing by gun grabbers. But when you read the article…. READ MORE

Second Amendment Prevails Over Cash-Flush Anti-Gun Candidates

Despite the lavishing of funds on anti-gun candidates and statements by anti-gunners that this would be the year they would mount a head-on challenge against the powerful National Rifle Association (NRA), when the smoke cleared, candidates supporting the rights of gun owners were the clear winners.Breitbart News reported “The Second Amendment crushed gun control candidates in Senate and gubernatorial races around the country,” and added that while gun-control PACs donated heavily to anti-gun candidates, “The Second Amendment trumped their endorsement and their money.” READ MORE

Supreme Court Grants BATFE Broad Leeway on “Straw Purchase” Rules in Abramski v. United States

On June 16, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Abramski v. United States. The ruling seemingly allows the government to require virtually any information it wants from a person buying a firearm from a federally licensed dealer, whether or not that information has any relationship to public safety or the policies of federal law. READ MORE

Sharply Divided Connecticut Bar Members Vote to Abandon Brady Campaign’s Anti-gun Litigation Effort

Lawyers are generally required to be admitted to the bar association of a given jurisdiction (and to pay bar dues) before being allowed to practice in that locale. The overarching purpose of bar associations is to maintain the integrity, trust, and quality of the legal profession, and more broadly, to promote justice and the rule of law. Bar associations pursue these goals by, for example, establishing minimum standards of knowledge or competence for entering the profession, rules of professional ethics and conduct, continuing education requirements and opportunities, and free or affordable legal aid programs. Experienced, knowledgeable attorneys are rarely in complete agreement about the meaning or application of the law itself, much less politics or social policy, so when a bar deviates from its inward focus on the legal profession to an outward focus on social engineering, controversy is certain to result. The reputation of the legal profession itself is also bound to suffer.READ MORE

Bloomberg’s wasted millions

Mike Bloomberg put $50 million into Tuesday’s elections, and he doesn’t have much to show for it. Someone, perhaps the Koch brothers, ought to treat him to a Big Gulp. The onetime mayor of New York City organized a group called Everytown for Gun Safety, meant to rival the National Rifle Association, and with a lot more money. The new group was supposed to put gun control on the front burner. Instead, the gun-control candidates got scorched on the back burner.READ MORE

Election Eve Dump: Justice Department Turns Over 64,280 pages of Claimed ‘Executive Privilege’ Operation Fast and Furious Documents

Last night, in response to an Order from a Federal judge, the Department of Justice turned over 64,280 pages of documents that were withheld from Congress after President Obama asserted Executive Privilege on the eve of a contempt citation for Attorney General Eric Holder in June 2012. The sheer volume of last night’s document production—which consists entirely of documents that the Justice Department itself acknowledges are not covered by Executive Privilege—shows that the President and the Attorney General attempted to extend the scope of the Executive Privilege well beyond its historical boundaries to avoid disclosing documents that embarrass or otherwise implicate senior Obama Administration officials.READ MORE

Voters Come Out in Strong Support of America’s Hunting Heritage and Second Amendment Right

On Tuesday, voters in Alabama, Mississippi and Maine came out in full support of protecting America’s hunting heritage and Second Amendment rights. The National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund (NRA-PVF) led the way to enshrine the Right to Hunt, Fish and Harvest Wildlife in the state constitutions of Alabama and Mississippi and worked with a coalition of sportsmen’s groups to protect hunters in Maine from extreme anti-hunting groups who aimed to ban traditional bear hunting methods in the state.READ MORE

NRA-PVF Achieves Historic Election Victories, While Anti-Gun Billionaire Michael Bloomberg is Proven to be a Political Liability

The NRA would like to congratulate pro-Second Amendment candidates across the country who won significant victories in their respective states and districts in Tuesday’s historic elections.  And the NRA would like to congratulate YOU–our members–for the role YOU played in achieving those victories!READ MORE

Voters Show Strong Support for America’s Hunting Heritage and Second Amendment Rights

On Tuesday, voters in Alabama, Mississippi and Maine came out in full support of protecting America’s hunting heritage and Second Amendment rights. The NRA Political Victory Fund led the way to enshrine the Right to Hunt, Fish and Harvest Wildlife in the state constitutions of Alabama and Mississippi and worked with a coalition of sportsmen’s groups to protect hunters in Maine from extreme anti-hunting groups who aimed to ban traditional bear hunting methods in the state.READ MORE

DOJ Uses Election Eve to Obscure Fast and Furious Document Dump

On November 3, the day before the midterm elections, the Department of Justice released over 64,000 pages of materials pertaining to BATFE’s Operation Fast and Furious, to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.  Some, including former CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson who helped break the Fast and Furious story, have suggested that the timing of the document dump was cynically calculated to ensure the release of the documents would not receive adequate press coverage.READ MORE

2014 “Firearms Law and The Second Amendment Symposium” a Great Success

The 2014 “Firearms Law & The Second Amendment Symposium” was held on Saturday, October 11, 2014, at the University of Baltimore in Maryland.READ MORE

Read.

Learn.

Train.

Train some more.

Do  More PT !

Do Even More PT !

The Second Amendment Foundation announced today it had won a “small, but significant” court ruling from a federal judge in the District of Columbia who denied a motion by the city to reconsider his July ruling that the District ban on carry outside of the home is unconstitutional “under any level of scrutiny.”

http://www.examiner.com/article/federal-court-denies-palmer-case-reconsideration-on-dc-carry-ban

In a victory for gun owners who simply seek medical care, not political philosophy, from their doctors, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has upheld the NRA-supported Florida’s Firearm Owner’s Privacy Act. This law was passed after an escalating series of events in which patients were harassed or denied access to services because they refused to be interrogated by their doctors about their ownership of firearms. The case, Wollschlaeger v. Governor of Florida, vindicated Florida’s attempt to protect patients from being forced to divulge personal information that is irrelevant to their own medical treatment.

In challenging the law, Dr. Wollschlaeger and the other plaintiffs insisted they had a First Amendment right to routinely grill patients on their choices concerning firearm ownership, without regard to any good faith belief such information was relevant to the patient’s individual case. They also alleged the law’s proscriptions were unconstitutionally vague.

The Court of Appeals rejected these claims.  “The essence of the Act,” the court’s opinion stated, “is simple: medical practitioners should not record information or inquire about patients’ firearm-ownership status when doing so is not necessary to providing the patient with good medical care.” Accordingly, the court determined that “[t]he Act merely circumscribes the unnecessary collection of patient information on one of many potential sensitive topics.”

As the court noted, nothing in the Florida law prohibits doctors from expressing their views about firearms or about any other medical or public policy issue. Rather, the law is within keeping of long-established “codes of conduct that define the practice of good medicine and affirm the responsibility that physicians bear” and “protects a patient’s ability to receive effective medical treatment without compromising the patient’s privacy with regard to matters unrelated to healthcare.”

http://www.nraila.org/legal/articles/2014/eleventh-circuit-upholds-florida-patient-privacy-law.aspx

Well, gun control advocates were able to write up their own initiative (594) and put it on the ballot in Washington State. With what may turn out to be a 50-to-1 spending advantage ($9.5 million to what appears to be a couple hundred thousand ($1.7 million was spent on another gun initiative)), the initiative passed with just less than 60 percent of the vote. What this vote implies is that even under ideal circumstances with a massive campaign spending advantage and picking a liberal state where they thought that the would do well, about 60 percent of the voters supported the initiative. Why do gun control advocates feel it necessary to so greatly exaggerate support for their initiatives? It will be interesting to see if the 90 percent claim keeps being made.

http://crimepreventionresearchcenter.org/2014/11/so-much-for-the-claim-that-nine-out-of-10-americans

Darrell Issa is concerned about what else Eric Holder's DOJ has withheld from Oversight.
Darrell Issa is concerned about what else Eric Holder’s DOJ has withheld from Oversight.
Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images

With the media and engaged citizens focused on critical mid-term elections, the Department of Justice turned over 64,000 pages of documents related to Operation Fast and Furious that it had previously claimed executive privilege for, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Responsibility announced Tuesday. Per the committee release, the production of the documents, compelled by court order, is further evidence the administration had no legitimate reasons for withholding them in the first place consistent with the purposes behind executive privilege, and their withholding was part of a continued effort to avoid disclosures “that embarrass or otherwise implicate senior Obama Administration officials.”

http://www.examiner.com/article/document-dump-shows-state-had-a-hand-fast-and-furious-redactions?CID=examiner_alerts_article

While outgoing Attorney General Eric Holder continues to fend off responsibility for the law enforcement snafu known as Operation Fast and Furious, documents obtained through a judge’s order reveal that not only did Holder know about the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), but he discussed it via email with his physician spouse, Sharon Malone, however President Barack Obama is granting those emails to be withheld based on an “executive privilege” claim.

http://www.examiner.com/article/ag-holder-s-wife-linked-to-fast-and-furious-and-abortion-clinic-fraud

wwhellno Pic shamelessly stolen from…I can’t recall,maybe WRSA?

Brief article and 3 short videos originally from NRA…

http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/articles/2014/10/must-see-video-vote-or-let-others-determine-the-scope-of-your-rights.aspx

The video’s…

***Edit*** I somehow screwed something up-or wordpress screwed something up in the posting of the videos,all three contain the whole series of three-so…

There’s a menu top left of the video screen-use it to pick part 1,2 or 3.

http://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuMExvF3VmU&list=PL9xworNMgEaqiJjTeofhIU-5dQywibXzM&index=1

In the following-the 3rd and last short video-watch the state of Oregon’s top Dr. try the same bullshit that Obama’s failed surgeon general nominee Dr. Vivek Murthy tried-claiming “gun violence” is a “public health issue” and Dr’s need to interrogate their patients about firearms.

The anti-gun zealots and leftists never stop trying-ever.

They start by indoctrinating our children in our public schools-brainwashing children into believing all guns are bad,and no one but cops and soldiers should have them-then the indoctrinated children grow up to be Dr’s like Murthy and this twit.

What part of shall not be infringed is it that they do not understand?

How the hell is living in a high-crime neighborhood NOT a valid reason for a CCW permit?

I don’t seem to recall anything in the Constitution or the BOR about needing permission from anyone to exercise my second amendment rights to keep and bear arms,nor do I recall anything about having to give some gooberment employee a reason before they “allow” me to exercise my right to keep and bear arms.

The government does NOT “give or grant” our rights to us-our rights are pre-existing,and have nothing whatsoever to do with only being “permitted” the right to carry a handgun for self-defense if and when the gooberment says we can carry a firearm to defend ourselves,our families,our property,and our homes.

These anti-gun leftist loons need some remedial education that does not take place in any of our state indoctrination camps…errrr…universities.

The government does NOT grant our rights-we have the right to self defense in spite of  the incessant .gov efforts to disarm us.

“Those who pound their guns into plows will plow for those who do not”—unknown

———————————————————————————————————————————————

D.C. is has been accepting applications for concealed handgun permits for about a week but that could soon end.

News4’s Mark Segraves is reporting D.C. Attorney General Irvin B. Nathan will appeal a judge’s ruling requiring the city to issue concealed carry permits. If successful, the District could take away any permits originally granted.

The Attorney General will file the appeal by the end of the year, but D.C. will continue accepting applications until a decision is made.

Right now, applicants must specifically show why they believe they need a permit. Officials say living in a high-crime neighborhood is not a sufficient reason. However, victims of domestic violence or death threats are among those who could be granted permits.

http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/DC-Attorney-General-to-Appeal-Concealed-Carry-Permits-280731232.html

For this truly ill informed,ignorant piece of prevarication published by Newsweek…

http://www.newsweek.com/2014/11/07/opinion-warning-tweeting-about-guns-can-keep-you-out-public-service-280804.html

In the weeks since we last reported on media attempts to tie NRA to the Ebola crisis because of our opposition to the nomination of Dr. Vivek Murthy as surgeon general, the anti-gun echo chamber has continued to promote this absurd line of argument. Absent most of the coverage is a forthright discussion of NRA’s legitimate concerns with the nominee, or any evidence that Murthy himself has a singular ability to effectively handle the nation’s Ebola response.

NRA opposes Dr. Murthy’s nomination for the very reason that he has a history of exploiting his status as a medical practitioner to advance a purely political agenda of extreme and unproven gun control measures. In January 2013, Dr. Murthy signed two letters sent from his organization Doctors for America (formerly Doctors for Obama) to Vice President Joe Biden and Congress, advocating for stringent gun controls. The letter to Congress advocated for a ban on popular semi-autos and their ammunition, limits on ammunition purchases, firearm owner licensing, and a mandatory waiting period of at least 48 hours. The letter also expressed a desire to leverage the resources of the Centers for Disease Control to provide data for gun control efforts. Such proposals are of obvious import to gun owners. Moreover, as surgeon general, Dr. Murthy would have the ideal platform to direct the nation’s public health apparatus towards redefining firearms ownership as a disease, a tactic that Congress has curbed with funding limits since the 1990s, but one President Obama hopes to reinvigorate.

Read more at…

http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/articles/2014/10/anti-nra-ebola-theme-infects-media-spreads-rapidly.aspx

This little gem at the end of my rant sums up Murthy as a person-a person who has had a lifelong anti-gun agenda and is not capable of doing any job without inserting his anti-gun bias into anything and everything-Mr. Murthy would do well to read up on OCD and Hoplophobia.

Murthy is in no way even a fair candidate for surgeon general-he insists that “gun violence”is a “public health” problem.

His solution-register and license firearms-and make gun ownership a disease.

The man thinks it’s just fine to classify an enumerated Constitutional right as a mental illness.

I’ve got news for Mr. Murthy-the only mental illness involved in this issue is his hoplophobia.

99.9% of gun owners are sane-have no mental illnesses,have no propensity to commit crimes of “gun violence”-or any crimes at all.

Mr. Murthy would simply continue his lifelong quest to ban gun ownership.

He is unfit for the job of surgeon general due to his far left political ideology,his lifelong anti-gun crusade,his intentions to make gun ownership a mental illness-and his support of far left causes.

No one who is so focused on idiocy like requiring a license to exercise an enumerated Constitutional right,requiring gun owners to register our firearms,classifying gun owners as having a mental illness,and using the CDC to generate junk “science” to support his anti-gun crusade is fit to be the surgeon general of the United States of America-period.

We’ve seen the CDC junk science to support gun control movie already-we do not need a remake of it.

We already had an administration determined to ban guns-we don’t need a repeat of slick Willie and the “assault weapons” ban,we do not need so-called “universal background checks”-we do not need to have a license required to exercise our second amendment right to keep and bear arms,and we sure as hell are not mentally ill-we sure as hell do NOT need to register our guns.

WE already have an administration that is hostile towards our second amendment right to keep and bear arms-the last thing we need is another member of this admin. in a position where he can use his job to promote his lifelong anti-gun agenda.

The leftists,libtards,progressives and metrosexuals that make up the current admin need to understand that if they fuck with our gun rights any more-in any way-it will be like they kicked a hornet’s nest.

Remember,during the revolutionary war-it only took III% of the population to defeat what was the greatest military on the planet at the time-the English navy ruled the seas,the English army was the largest fighting force in the world at the time-and THREE PERCENT of the population kicked their asses and sent them home to England as a defeated wrold power.

That shit can,and will happen again-you can only kick a sleeping dog so many times before it bites you…

Kicking the hornets nest that is Americas gun owners would be like poking a sleeping grizzly bear-something no sane person does.

The .gov morons who helped create the current police state would like nothing more than to disarm the population-it’s much easier to control the population that way-between creating a blizzard of paperwork that is the United States Code,and the labyrinth of fed and other .gov agency laws,rules, and regs these things makes it so any prosecutor in any state,in any county of the United States can charge and convict anyone they want to,at any time they want to for violating something-or many somethings from the absurd number of laws on the books.

None of this is Constitutional-it is a violation of our civil rights-any and every gun owner charged with any one of these insane laws/rules/regs needs to file a lawsuit for violation of civil rights under Title 42,Section 1983 of the USC…

42 U.S. Code § 1983 – Civil action for deprivation of rights

“Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.”

If everyone who was charged with these insane,absurd,obscure laws would demand a jury trial,then sue for the civil rights violation that it is-this bullshit would stop.

The only thing Mr. Murthy is an expert at is attempting to violate the civil rights of all American gun owners-that and being a leftist loon.

Oh yeah-here’s the little gem that started my rant…

“Yet even before Murthy gained fame as Obama’s unlikely pick for America’s top doctor — chosen at an age when most physicians are still struggling to establish their practices and pay off medical school loans — he was offering his unsolicited “expertise” on gun control in correspondence to America’s leaders.  Should he likewise care to offer his musings on combating Ebola, he presumably remembers the addresses of the White House and Capitol and will chime in accordingly.”