“Political correctness is nothing more than a tool that collectivists and statists exploit in order to better achieve their endgame, which is conning the masses into believing that the group mind is real and that the individual mind is fiction.”

Robert Gore's avatarSTRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

From Brandon Smith, at alt-market.com:

I rarely touch on the subject of political correctness as a focus in my writings, partially because the entire issue is so awash in pundits on either side that the scrambling clatter of voices tends to drown out the liberty movement perspective. Also, I don’t really see PC cultism as separate from the problems I am always battling against: collectivism and the erasure of the individual in the name of pleasing society. Political correctness is nothing more than a tool that collectivists and statists exploit in order to better achieve their endgame, which is conning the masses into believing that the group mind is real and that the individual mind is fiction.

Last year, I covered the PC issue in my article “The Twisted Motives Behind Political Correctness.” I believe I analyzed the bulk of the issue extensively. However, the times are changing at a…

View original post 336 more words

Love your Diesel

Posted: July 17, 2015 by gamegetterII in Uncategorized

Something everyone needs to do.

We Knew This Was Comin

Posted: July 17, 2015 by gamegetterII in Uncategorized

rogerunited's avatarNC Links

Via Brittius

AJC

It would take a monster of a sandblaster, and raise some highly uncomfortable questions about the selective editing of history, but the Atlanta chapter of the NAACP has called for the removal of the giant carving that depicts three leaders of the Confederate States of America on Stone Mountain.

“It is time for Georgia and other Southern states to end the glorification of slavery and white supremacy paid for and maintained with the taxes of all its citizens,” reads the chapter’s release. “NAACP Atlanta chapter is calling for the immediate removal of all Confederate Memorial Monuments maintained by the state of Georgia using taxpayer money.”

Extra research would have paid off here. The Stone Mountain Memorial Association, which operates the park, is self-supporting. Nonetheless, the discussion was bound to take this turn as Georgia wrestles with its Confederate legacy after the shooting deaths of nine black…

View original post 287 more words

Y’all,

Posted: July 17, 2015 by gamegetterII in Uncategorized
https://i0.wp.com/beforeitsnews.com/mediadrop/uploads/2015/26/5afc85b0fc65bbf2e03742fb8bc7c270e5f3b69f.png
I wish to put some things in perspective, as we are now living under conditions that are similar to what happened in Germany under Hitler and also very similar to the conditions our ancestors in the South endured prior to the secession of the Southern States. But it is now even more complicated, because we have a certain percentage of the Black community that is very ignorant and militant due to the propaganda spread by the US school system and the media for 150 years.
These two governors Ball-less Bentley, and Spine-less Haley have created a very dangerous climate for white Southerners throughout the South. They have laid the groundwork for endless confrontations between the races and any injuries or, God forbid, deaths that occur from this point forward as a result of racial clashes will be entirely their fault. Had they had the intestinal fortitude to stand their ground and say no to the small minority of race baiters who were calling for the flags removal, and shifted the issue of those 9 murders to the real causes instead of letting the media and the investigators who found the picture of him waving a flag capitalize on that non-issue, all of this would have been avoided.
However what people don’t understand is that this is not about heritage or flags, it is a completely orchestrated program of cultural cleansing and whether Bentley and Haley are just unknowing dupes in this cleansing or are in with the powers that be is irrelevant, because what they have done is create conditions where people in the South who hold their heritage dear to their hearts will now have to fear intimidation, injury or even death if they dare express their Confederate ancestry through tee-shirts, bumper stickers, flags or even the legal license plate with the SCV logo on it.
On top of what I’ve just said is the little known fact that our so-called government has in the past, and will again now use a tactic know as controlled opposition to further their socialist agenda. They will send a large group of Government paid lackeys somewhere, dressed as Southern folks and waving flags to purposely create a disturbance and a media event so they can then smear all Southerners on TV and in the prostituted press. We have no voice, and the truth will never be told, just as in Waco and Ruby Ridge.
Read the rest @ Free North Carolina Here

Via NC Renegade Here

by Diane Rufino, July 11, 2015

US CONSTITUTION:  AMENDMENT PROPOSAL

An amendment to replace the States’ influence in the federal government since the 17th Amendment was adopted.

“…If no remedy of the abuse be practicable under the forms of the Constitution, I should prefer a resort to the Nation for an amendment of the Tribunal itself.”  — James Madison, in a letter to Thomas Jefferson, 1832

AMENDMENT PROPOSAL:

Whereas, “The Creator has made the earth for the living, not for the dead.  Rights and powers can only belong to persons, not to things.”  (Thomas Jefferson).  Rights and powers do not originate or belong to a government, unless that power is exercised for the People – on behalf of them – and NOT against them;

Whereas, the several States, by a compact under the style and title “Constitution for the United States,” and of amendments thereto, voluntarily constituted a general government for special common purposes;

Whereas, the several States are parties to the compact (Constitution), with the people of said States acting in their own conventions to consider, debate, deliberate, and ratify it;

Whereas, our government structure is predicated on separation of powers between the States, as sovereigns, and the federal government, which is sovereign with respect to certain responsibilities;

Whereas, this separation of powers, known as federalism, is a critical feature of our government system, intended to safeguard the “precious gem” of individual liberty by limiting government overreach;

Whereas, there is no provision in the Constitution nor any grant of delegated power by which the States can be said to have (willingly or intentionally) surrendered their sovereignty, for it is clear that no State would have ratified the document and the Union would not have been established;

Whereas, the States were too watchful to leave the opportunity open to chance and using an abundance of caution, insisted that a series of amendments be added, including the Tenth Amendment, as a condition of ratification and formation of the Union;

Whereas, the Preamble to the Bill of Rights expressed the unambiguous intention of those amendments, and reads: “The Conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution”;

Whereas, that relationship between the states and the federal government is defined by the Tenth Amendment, which reads:  “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people”;

Whereas, the critical relationship has been eroded through the many Supreme Court decisions which have transferred power from the States to the federal government in order to enlarge its sphere of influence;

Whereas, the federal government has made itself the exclusive and final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself, and as such, its need for power and its discretion – and not the Constitution – have been guiding those decisions.

Whereas, the federal government has created for itself an absolute monopoly over the possession and scope of its powers and has consistently assumed powers it wasn’t meant to have – misappropriating them from the States and from the People;

Whereas, the federal government has used said monopoly to change the nature of the Constitution and redefine its terms without using the lawful route, Article V;

Whereas, the particular security of the people is in the possession of a written and stable Constitution. The branches of the federal government have made it a blank piece of paper by construction;

Whereas, the federal government, through the consolidation and concerted action of its branches and said monopoly, the government has created a government that is bloated, vested with illegitimate powers, coercive, wasteful, corrupt, and out of touch with the People, is one in which less than a quarter of the people have trust in, and most importantly, is one that poses serious threats to the exercise of the freedoms that Americans are promised;

Whereas, the right of judging on infractions of inherent powers is a fundamental attribute of sovereignty which cannot be denied to the States, and therefore they must be allowed to do so;

Whereas, the States need a voice directly in the federal government in order to break up its monopoly and to serve as the only effective check to prevent unconstitutional laws from being enforced;

Therefore, in order to reverse the unintended concentration of power in the federal government and in order to divest it of powers it has misappropriated and assumed for the past 200 years

More…

Confederate flag    Via NC Renegade here

People waving Confederate flags have greeted President Barack Obama as he arrived at his hotel in Oklahoma.

As his motorcade rolled into Oklahoma City on Wednesday night, about 10 rebel flags were in the crowd, alongside some US flags.

Critics of the emblem, used in battle by southern states in the US Civil War, say it is a symbol of slavery.

A backlash against the flag has grown since a gunman killed nine black people at a church bible study last month.

More…

Methuen, MA — In what can only be described as a “see, I told you so” moment for those in the police accountability sector, a police department in Massachusetts has been caught in a perfidious hiring scheme. They were giving preference to job candidates who said they wouldn’t arrest fellow cops.

In other words, the Methuen police department was only hiring cops who promised to be corrupt and cover for their fellow corrupt officers.

According to the Boston Globe, 

A Civil Service Commission official wrote that he was dismayed to learn that the city gave higher points to applicants who said they wouldn’t arrest a family member or an officer they knew, while docking points from who said they would.

“The City turned the interview process upside down,” wrote Christopher C. Bowman, chairman of the Civil Service Commission, in a July 9 decision. “There is simply no valid basis to award the highest points to candidates who express a willingness to apply one set of rules to strangers and another set of rules to friends and family members.”

Ah, but there is a valid basis to award applicants who promise not arrest their fellow cop. Ever hear of the thin blue line?

In police departments across the country, cops who go against this standard and try to hold their fellow officers accountable, are often the subject of demotions, firings, and have even had their lives threatened.

Of course, the Methuen police are spinning this practice of seeking out those who would protect their fellow law-breaking officers by saying that it helps them assess the honesty of candidates.

“I’m looking for some bearing, some honesty, and how quickly the person can think on their feet,” Police Lieutenant Michael Pappalardo testified.

To Lieutenant Pappalardo, it is called ‘honesty’ when police officers look the other way as their fellow officers break the law. How valiant and noble of them!

“Some of the interview panelists actually heaped high praise on those candidates who stated that they would arrest a stranger but not arrest a friend or family member based on the same facts, citing their understanding of ‘discretion,’” Bowman wrote in his decision.

This special treatment for cops who get caught breaking the law and are not charged is called “professional courtesy.” As the Globe noted in December, it is, in fact, quite rare for cops to be charged when they are caught drinking and driving.

“Every police officer who testified before the commission testified that the routine and customary practice when a stop is made on a fellow police officer, is to show professional courtesy and not call in the stop,” the report said.

The hiring practice of Massachusetts police cherry picking cops who won’t hold their fellow cops accountable seem to have been particularly effective. Cops can rape, kill, drink and drive, steal, and commit a myriad of other crimes and the majority of the time they receive but a small slap on the wrist.

The public recognition of hiring those who will simply act as another brick in the blue wall gives us incite into how and why it is so rare and difficult for police officers to prevent corruption in their own departments.

The next time you see a cop, like Timothy Boling of the LMPD, keep his job after getting caught driving drunk in his police cruiser, or firing at SWAT officers during a standoff in which he’s the bad guy — you’ll know exactly why.
Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/police-dept-caught-giving-preference-job-candidates-arrest-fellow-cops/#XrM77tH2IPB4KkWW.99