Posts Tagged ‘anti-gun idiocy’

Note that there is no mention of the anti-gun asshattery that took place in Washington state,or the fact that Malloy is still gov. of Conn. Hickenlooper is still gov. of Colorado,and the two seats that the GOP won after the recall elections went to Dems, or that Cuomo is still frothing at the mouth to have his gestapo start kicking in doors because most people are ignoring the SAFE Act,Malloy is doing the same-as a whole lot of gun owners gave him the finger over the absurd “assault weapons” ban now in place.

This dumb asses have no clue what they are playing with-if they do start sending their minions to kick in gun owners doors at 4 am-people are gonna die-a lot of people-on both sides of the issue-because everyone I know is going to come out of their bedroom shooting if their door is kicked in at 4am.

These leftist idiots have no clue what they are fucking with,the shit they would start if they tried confiscating firearms.

The NRA’s news releases,updates,daily alerts-crickets about the loss of gun rights-they are spinning the elections into a gun rights victory-What The FUCK are they doing?????

We need a new gun rights group-Alan Gottleib and his Second Amendment Foundation took over JPFO-so we are left with exactly ZERO pro-gun groups who are solidly opposed to any more infringements from team .gov inc.

Not a word from NRA about the huge loss of rights in Washington-passed because the socialists/leftists/communists/and the uber rich like Bill Gates bought the votes of the Free Shit Army and the leftover hippies,tree huggers,animal “rights” whackos,and enviro nazis who have taken over the big cities.

Here’s today’s spin from the NRA…

Note this one…”Gun Control Loses, Second Amendment Wins Big In The Midterms”  WTF?????????

New Posts: November 7, 2014
Please forward this information to your family, friends, and fellow gun owners!

Mississippi Overwhelmingly Approves NRA-Backed Amendment 1

On Tuesday, voters exhibited a firm commitment to preserving the Magnolia State’s strong sporting traditions by ratifying NRA-supported Amendment 1 by a convincing 88 percent of the vote.  Amendment 1 establishes an individual constitutional right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife. Mississippi becomes the 18th state to add this important safeguard into the state’s constitution.

READ MORE

Gun Control Loses, Second Amendment Wins Big In The Midterms

One might well call it a clear denial of reality by vanquished liberals grasping for any hint that their agenda even barely survived the Republican tsunami — “it” is this wildly celebratory article on theatlantic.com boldly declaring victory for advocates of gun control in America. Given the title of the post — “The Gun Control Movement Is Learning How To Win” — you might conclude that anti-gun forces scored big in their efforts to restrict private gun ownership…that the NRA was totally humiliated on Tuesday and sent packing by gun grabbers. But when you read the article…. READ MORE

Second Amendment Prevails Over Cash-Flush Anti-Gun Candidates

Despite the lavishing of funds on anti-gun candidates and statements by anti-gunners that this would be the year they would mount a head-on challenge against the powerful National Rifle Association (NRA), when the smoke cleared, candidates supporting the rights of gun owners were the clear winners.Breitbart News reported “The Second Amendment crushed gun control candidates in Senate and gubernatorial races around the country,” and added that while gun-control PACs donated heavily to anti-gun candidates, “The Second Amendment trumped their endorsement and their money.” READ MORE

Supreme Court Grants BATFE Broad Leeway on “Straw Purchase” Rules in Abramski v. United States

On June 16, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Abramski v. United States. The ruling seemingly allows the government to require virtually any information it wants from a person buying a firearm from a federally licensed dealer, whether or not that information has any relationship to public safety or the policies of federal law. READ MORE

Sharply Divided Connecticut Bar Members Vote to Abandon Brady Campaign’s Anti-gun Litigation Effort

Lawyers are generally required to be admitted to the bar association of a given jurisdiction (and to pay bar dues) before being allowed to practice in that locale. The overarching purpose of bar associations is to maintain the integrity, trust, and quality of the legal profession, and more broadly, to promote justice and the rule of law. Bar associations pursue these goals by, for example, establishing minimum standards of knowledge or competence for entering the profession, rules of professional ethics and conduct, continuing education requirements and opportunities, and free or affordable legal aid programs. Experienced, knowledgeable attorneys are rarely in complete agreement about the meaning or application of the law itself, much less politics or social policy, so when a bar deviates from its inward focus on the legal profession to an outward focus on social engineering, controversy is certain to result. The reputation of the legal profession itself is also bound to suffer.READ MORE

Bloomberg’s wasted millions

Mike Bloomberg put $50 million into Tuesday’s elections, and he doesn’t have much to show for it. Someone, perhaps the Koch brothers, ought to treat him to a Big Gulp. The onetime mayor of New York City organized a group called Everytown for Gun Safety, meant to rival the National Rifle Association, and with a lot more money. The new group was supposed to put gun control on the front burner. Instead, the gun-control candidates got scorched on the back burner.READ MORE

Election Eve Dump: Justice Department Turns Over 64,280 pages of Claimed ‘Executive Privilege’ Operation Fast and Furious Documents

Last night, in response to an Order from a Federal judge, the Department of Justice turned over 64,280 pages of documents that were withheld from Congress after President Obama asserted Executive Privilege on the eve of a contempt citation for Attorney General Eric Holder in June 2012. The sheer volume of last night’s document production—which consists entirely of documents that the Justice Department itself acknowledges are not covered by Executive Privilege—shows that the President and the Attorney General attempted to extend the scope of the Executive Privilege well beyond its historical boundaries to avoid disclosing documents that embarrass or otherwise implicate senior Obama Administration officials.READ MORE

Voters Come Out in Strong Support of America’s Hunting Heritage and Second Amendment Right

On Tuesday, voters in Alabama, Mississippi and Maine came out in full support of protecting America’s hunting heritage and Second Amendment rights. The National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund (NRA-PVF) led the way to enshrine the Right to Hunt, Fish and Harvest Wildlife in the state constitutions of Alabama and Mississippi and worked with a coalition of sportsmen’s groups to protect hunters in Maine from extreme anti-hunting groups who aimed to ban traditional bear hunting methods in the state.READ MORE

NRA-PVF Achieves Historic Election Victories, While Anti-Gun Billionaire Michael Bloomberg is Proven to be a Political Liability

The NRA would like to congratulate pro-Second Amendment candidates across the country who won significant victories in their respective states and districts in Tuesday’s historic elections.  And the NRA would like to congratulate YOU–our members–for the role YOU played in achieving those victories!READ MORE

Voters Show Strong Support for America’s Hunting Heritage and Second Amendment Rights

On Tuesday, voters in Alabama, Mississippi and Maine came out in full support of protecting America’s hunting heritage and Second Amendment rights. The NRA Political Victory Fund led the way to enshrine the Right to Hunt, Fish and Harvest Wildlife in the state constitutions of Alabama and Mississippi and worked with a coalition of sportsmen’s groups to protect hunters in Maine from extreme anti-hunting groups who aimed to ban traditional bear hunting methods in the state.READ MORE

DOJ Uses Election Eve to Obscure Fast and Furious Document Dump

On November 3, the day before the midterm elections, the Department of Justice released over 64,000 pages of materials pertaining to BATFE’s Operation Fast and Furious, to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.  Some, including former CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson who helped break the Fast and Furious story, have suggested that the timing of the document dump was cynically calculated to ensure the release of the documents would not receive adequate press coverage.READ MORE

2014 “Firearms Law and The Second Amendment Symposium” a Great Success

The 2014 “Firearms Law & The Second Amendment Symposium” was held on Saturday, October 11, 2014, at the University of Baltimore in Maryland.READ MORE

Read.

Learn.

Train.

Train some more.

Do  More PT !

Do Even More PT !

The Second Amendment Foundation announced today it had won a “small, but significant” court ruling from a federal judge in the District of Columbia who denied a motion by the city to reconsider his July ruling that the District ban on carry outside of the home is unconstitutional “under any level of scrutiny.”

http://www.examiner.com/article/federal-court-denies-palmer-case-reconsideration-on-dc-carry-ban

In a victory for gun owners who simply seek medical care, not political philosophy, from their doctors, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has upheld the NRA-supported Florida’s Firearm Owner’s Privacy Act. This law was passed after an escalating series of events in which patients were harassed or denied access to services because they refused to be interrogated by their doctors about their ownership of firearms. The case, Wollschlaeger v. Governor of Florida, vindicated Florida’s attempt to protect patients from being forced to divulge personal information that is irrelevant to their own medical treatment.

In challenging the law, Dr. Wollschlaeger and the other plaintiffs insisted they had a First Amendment right to routinely grill patients on their choices concerning firearm ownership, without regard to any good faith belief such information was relevant to the patient’s individual case. They also alleged the law’s proscriptions were unconstitutionally vague.

The Court of Appeals rejected these claims.  “The essence of the Act,” the court’s opinion stated, “is simple: medical practitioners should not record information or inquire about patients’ firearm-ownership status when doing so is not necessary to providing the patient with good medical care.” Accordingly, the court determined that “[t]he Act merely circumscribes the unnecessary collection of patient information on one of many potential sensitive topics.”

As the court noted, nothing in the Florida law prohibits doctors from expressing their views about firearms or about any other medical or public policy issue. Rather, the law is within keeping of long-established “codes of conduct that define the practice of good medicine and affirm the responsibility that physicians bear” and “protects a patient’s ability to receive effective medical treatment without compromising the patient’s privacy with regard to matters unrelated to healthcare.”

http://www.nraila.org/legal/articles/2014/eleventh-circuit-upholds-florida-patient-privacy-law.aspx

Well, gun control advocates were able to write up their own initiative (594) and put it on the ballot in Washington State. With what may turn out to be a 50-to-1 spending advantage ($9.5 million to what appears to be a couple hundred thousand ($1.7 million was spent on another gun initiative)), the initiative passed with just less than 60 percent of the vote. What this vote implies is that even under ideal circumstances with a massive campaign spending advantage and picking a liberal state where they thought that the would do well, about 60 percent of the voters supported the initiative. Why do gun control advocates feel it necessary to so greatly exaggerate support for their initiatives? It will be interesting to see if the 90 percent claim keeps being made.

http://crimepreventionresearchcenter.org/2014/11/so-much-for-the-claim-that-nine-out-of-10-americans

So much for the claim that “Nine out of 10 Americans support [expanded] background checks”

Screen Shot 2014-11-05 at  Wednesday, November 5, 9.41 AM
It is frequently claimed that 90 percent of Americans support the expanded background check bills that are being considered before different legislatures, though other surveys indicate that support for the actual bills is below 50 percent.

Well, gun control advocates were able to write up their own initiative (594) and put it on the ballot in Washington State. With what may turn out to be a 50-to-1 spending advantage ($9.5 million to what appears to be a couple hundred thousand ($1.7 million was spent on another gun initiative)), the initiative passed with just less than 60 percent of the vote. What this vote implies is that even under ideal circumstances with a massive campaign spending advantage and picking a liberal state where they thought that the would do well, about 60 percent of the voters supported the initiative. Why do gun control advocates feel it necessary to so greatly exaggerate support for their initiatives? It will be interesting to see if the 90 percent claim keeps being made.

http://crimepreventionresearchcenter.org/2014/11/so-much-for-the-claim-that-nine-out-of-10-americans-support-expanded-background-checks/

Darrell Issa is concerned about what else Eric Holder's DOJ has withheld from Oversight.
Darrell Issa is concerned about what else Eric Holder’s DOJ has withheld from Oversight.
Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images

With the media and engaged citizens focused on critical mid-term elections, the Department of Justice turned over 64,000 pages of documents related to Operation Fast and Furious that it had previously claimed executive privilege for, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Responsibility announced Tuesday. Per the committee release, the production of the documents, compelled by court order, is further evidence the administration had no legitimate reasons for withholding them in the first place consistent with the purposes behind executive privilege, and their withholding was part of a continued effort to avoid disclosures “that embarrass or otherwise implicate senior Obama Administration officials.”

http://www.examiner.com/article/document-dump-shows-state-had-a-hand-fast-and-furious-redactions?CID=examiner_alerts_article

While outgoing Attorney General Eric Holder continues to fend off responsibility for the law enforcement snafu known as Operation Fast and Furious, documents obtained through a judge’s order reveal that not only did Holder know about the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), but he discussed it via email with his physician spouse, Sharon Malone, however President Barack Obama is granting those emails to be withheld based on an “executive privilege” claim.

http://www.examiner.com/article/ag-holder-s-wife-linked-to-fast-and-furious-and-abortion-clinic-fraud

wwhellno Pic shamelessly stolen from…I can’t recall,maybe WRSA?

Brief article and 3 short videos originally from NRA…

http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/articles/2014/10/must-see-video-vote-or-let-others-determine-the-scope-of-your-rights.aspx

The video’s…

***Edit*** I somehow screwed something up-or wordpress screwed something up in the posting of the videos,all three contain the whole series of three-so…

There’s a menu top left of the video screen-use it to pick part 1,2 or 3.

In the following-the 3rd and last short video-watch the state of Oregon’s top Dr. try the same bullshit that Obama’s failed surgeon general nominee Dr. Vivek Murthy tried-claiming “gun violence” is a “public health issue” and Dr’s need to interrogate their patients about firearms.

The anti-gun zealots and leftists never stop trying-ever.

They start by indoctrinating our children in our public schools-brainwashing children into believing all guns are bad,and no one but cops and soldiers should have them-then the indoctrinated children grow up to be Dr’s like Murthy and this twit.

What part of shall not be infringed is it that they do not understand?

How the hell is living in a high-crime neighborhood NOT a valid reason for a CCW permit?

I don’t seem to recall anything in the Constitution or the BOR about needing permission from anyone to exercise my second amendment rights to keep and bear arms,nor do I recall anything about having to give some gooberment employee a reason before they “allow” me to exercise my right to keep and bear arms.

The government does NOT “give or grant” our rights to us-our rights are pre-existing,and have nothing whatsoever to do with only being “permitted” the right to carry a handgun for self-defense if and when the gooberment says we can carry a firearm to defend ourselves,our families,our property,and our homes.

These anti-gun leftist loons need some remedial education that does not take place in any of our state indoctrination camps…errrr…universities.

The government does NOT grant our rights-we have the right to self defense in spite of  the incessant .gov efforts to disarm us.

“Those who pound their guns into plows will plow for those who do not”—unknown

———————————————————————————————————————————————

D.C. is has been accepting applications for concealed handgun permits for about a week but that could soon end.

News4’s Mark Segraves is reporting D.C. Attorney General Irvin B. Nathan will appeal a judge’s ruling requiring the city to issue concealed carry permits. If successful, the District could take away any permits originally granted.

The Attorney General will file the appeal by the end of the year, but D.C. will continue accepting applications until a decision is made.

Right now, applicants must specifically show why they believe they need a permit. Officials say living in a high-crime neighborhood is not a sufficient reason. However, victims of domestic violence or death threats are among those who could be granted permits.

http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/DC-Attorney-General-to-Appeal-Concealed-Carry-Permits-280731232.html

For this truly ill informed,ignorant piece of prevarication published by Newsweek…

http://www.newsweek.com/2014/11/07/opinion-warning-tweeting-about-guns-can-keep-you-out-public-service-280804.html