Posts Tagged ‘anti-hunting groups’

Pay close attention to this issue-when the public comment period starts-get as many people as you can to comment in favor of hunting grizzlies,or the animal “rights” whackos and enviro-nazis will flood the comments in opposition to hunting grizzlies.

Time to beat ’em at their own game-they’ve been using the comment period on any proposed changes of any wildlife management issue to oppose hunting of any animal. Look what they did with the wolf “re-introduction” fiasco-they flooded every public comments forum,and filed a blizzard of legal paperwork to oppose any wolf hunting or trapping,and the elk herds suffered,many have been decimated by unchecked wolf numbers.

Time to get the animal “rights”whackos and enviro-nazis out of our government’s agencies such as USFS,USFWS,BLM,EPA,etc.

Don’t let these nutcases dictate policy any longer-their goal is to ban ALL hunting and trapping on PUBLIC land-hunters ARE a huge part of the public,and it is hunters who fund well over 90% of ALL wildlife conservation in the U.S. It’s time hunters get a voice in policy making,not just the animal “rights” and enviro whackos.

Via Field & Stream

After 40 years of federal protection, grizzly bears may become fair game for hunters, as a handful of Western states push for the responsibility of managing the animals.

The Associated Press reports that a plan drafted by wildlife officials from the greater Yellowstone states of Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana estimates how many grizzly bears could be harvested while still maintaining viable populations if the species were no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act.

Though the proposal doesn’t specify the number of bears each state would permit to be harvested, it does specify a 19,300-square-mile management zone that includes the wilderness and national forests near the Yellowstone National Park. Further, the proposal allocates a 58-percent share of the permitted harvests to Wyoming—likely because it’s home to most of the region’s grizzlies—while Montana would get 34 percent and Idaho 8 percent.

Officials estimate that there are more than 700 grizzlies in the defined management zone, though biologists say that there are likely more living outside the borders, as the bears have expanded their range as their populations have grown.

In a December 4, 2015, joint letter to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Director Dan Ashe, the states’ wildlife directors urged the federal government to retract the bear’s threatened status. “It is critically important that we capitalize on our tremendous progress and momentum. . . by proceeding with a long overdue delisting,” the letter stated.

The last legal grizzly hunt in the Lower 48 was in the early 1970s, and a total of 58 bears were harvested in the five years leading to the species’ being listed as threatened, in 1975, as the AP notes. Since that time, the bear’s numbers have rebounded. Opponents to the proposal, however, argue that it’s too soon to consider hunting as a management tool because grizzly populations are still too low.

Quentin Kujala, chief of wildlife management for Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks, says that the harvest quotas will likely be modest and on a sliding scale to help maintain viable bear populations and to avoid any chance of the species reverting back to federal protection. Hunting will be allowed if there were more than 675 bears, and it will be barred if the number drops to fewer than 600, Kujala said. Likewise, Wyoming Game and Fish spokesman Renny MacKay told the AP: “We’re definitely not talking about a large number. We’re not talking hundreds or anywhere near that.”

The Christian Science Monitor points out that tourism is a $1-billion industry in the greater Yellowstone area, and that, according to research, the park could lose $10 million without the potential of spotting bear near the roadside.

If the FWS removes grizzlies from federal protection and the states proceed with the plan, the proposition will need to undergo a public-comment period. The FWS is expected to make a decision on whether to release grizzlies from federal protection early this year, but barring any court challenges, it could take up to a year for any rule changes to go into effect.