Law & Disorder / Civilization & Discontents

FedEx won’t ship the box that makes homemade metal semi-automatic rifles

“I’ll have to smuggle the damn thing out of my own city,” Cody Wilson tells Ars.

Defense Distributed, the group that pioneered 3D printed firearms in 2013, informed its customers on Tuesday that FedEx has refused to ship the company’s latest product, a computer-numerically-controlled (CNC) mill—dubbed the “Ghost Gunner.”“I’ve got an account with another courier, but FedEx is bewildering because the reason I started with them in the first place was their [National Rifle Association] advantage program,” the company’s founder, Cody Wilson, told Ars by text message.

FedEx did not immediately respond to Ars’ request for comment, but spokesman Scott Fiedler told Wired on Tuesday:

This device is capable of manufacturing firearms, and potentially by private individuals. We are uncertain at this time whether this device is a regulated commodity by local, state or federal governments. As such, to ensure we comply with the applicable law and regulations, FedEx declined to ship this device until we know more about how it will be regulated.

The United States Postal Service, UPS, and DHL did not immediately respond to Ars’ request for comment.

However, unfinished lower receivers for AR-15 semi-automatic rifles are routinely shipped nationwide, as are CNC mills.

The AR-15, the civilian version of the M-16 military assault rifle, is designed to be modular, meaning it can be assembled from different receivers, barrels, buttstocks, and other components, each with its own characteristics.

Under American federal law, the lower receiver part of a firearm is the crucial part that contains all of the gun’s operating parts, including the trigger group and the magazine port. (In short, the lower is what’s defined as the firearm itself.) The Ghost Gunner is designed to take an unfinished receiver (sometimes dubbed an “80 percent” lower) and finish the job.

As a result, Wilson added, FedEx will almost certainly lose his business.

“The thing is I bet UPS will blackball me as well and I’ll have to smuggle the damn thing out of my own city,” he wrote, adding that to date he has sold “around 1,200” of the devices, and that he “can’t keep up with demand.”

Even at the introductory price of $1,200 (which has since been raised to $1,500), that would mean that Defense Distributed has taken in over $800,000 in revenue in just a few months. (Not all of the sold mills have been fully paid beyond an initial deposit.) The site reports the Ghost Gunner is backordered until Q2 2015.

“I will find another way”

As Ars reported previously, the Ghost Gunner, which first debuted in October 2014, can complete an unfinished lower receiver for an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle in around an hour. While designed to mill an AR-15 lower, the CNC could theoretically mill anything of a similar size.Now, the total cost of a semi-finished lower, a parts kit, an upper, a magazine, and the Ghost Gunner ($1,500) is around $2,300—not a significant savings over buying the whole thing lock, stock, and barrel. However, many hobbyists are excited at the opportunity, particularly given the fact that it makes such weapons effectively anonymous and untraceable.

The Ghost Gunner makes home gunsmithing faster, cheaper, and more portable than ever before.

In the Tuesday e-mail to supporters, Wilson elaborated:

Now FedEx has told me that they will NOT ship my product at all, and though they will not give me a reason in writing, they have told Wired.com that it is because my machine allows an individual to make a gun.

I will find another way to ship the machine. I emailed today because I feel you should know that FedEx is uncomfortable with the constitutionally protected right to make a rifle free from government surveillance. They may cater to the firearms industry, but they have a specific antipathy to the non-commercial acquisition of firearms.

When is a gun not a gun?

With a semi-finished lower, a parts kit, an upper, and a magazine, Wilson previously told Ars that anyone can hook up the mill to their computer and have a gun ready to fire in a short period of time.”Our gold standard is: you’re going to finish it in an hour,” he said.

The United States Gun Control Act (GCA) of 1968 allows anyone to manufacture their own firearm without a license, but manufacturing such weaponry for sale or transfer does require a federal license.

As a way to get around that law, manufacturers can make a product that isn’t technically a gun, but gets as close to the line as possible. The Ghost Gunner CNC mill requires that the buyer provide their own semi-finished lower, which is sometimes dubbed an “80 percent lower.”

“The term 80 percent receiver comes from the seller, that’s not a term that we use,” a spokesman from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) told Ars last year.

“That’s a term from the seller or creator of the device that it’s 80 percent of a finished receiver, therefore it is legal. That’s not a determination we make.”

In short, in the ATF’s view, either something is a firearm or it isn’t—and if it isn’t, it can be sold without restriction.

But in January 2015, the agency released ATF Rule 2015-1 and clarified that a gunsmith or machine shop cannot use its tool to refine an 80 percent to make it a suitable firearm, but the ruling does not affect CNCs owned by individuals.

“Nothing in this ruling affects the ability of individuals to make their own firearms for personal use, as allowed by law,” Ginger Colbrun, an ATF spokeswoman, told Ars by e-mail on Tuesday.

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/02/fedex-wont-ship-the-box-that-makes-homemade-metal-semi-automatic-rifles/

A remarkable report from Spencer Ackerman at The Guardian has revealed in detail the existence of an interrogation facility used by Chicago police to detain and hold people in secret. The report describes how police have used a “nondescript warehouse” to keep detainees out of booking databases, beat prisoners, shackle them for “prolonged periods,” and keep them from legal counsel for up to 24 hours — including even children as young as 15.

If that sounds familiar, it’s because the US has used similar facilities around the world since 9/11 in its prosecution of the “war on terror.” CIA “black sites” around the world have been used to secretly detain, interrogate, and torture alleged enemies of state. Use of these sites for “extraordinary rendition” is one of the darkest aspects of the US war on terror, and has been the target of criticism from a broad spectrum of observers.

America has entered a period of constitutional horror

Unlike the CIA’s black sites, The Guardian reports that the Chicago facility targets people who aren’t suspected of terror-related activities; the site is reportedly shared by anti-gang and anti-drug police units.

In one instance, The Guardian reports, 12 people who were protesting a Nato summit in 2012 were taken to the warehouse. One man, Jacob Church, says he was cuffed to a bench for around 17 hours and interrogated without receiving Miranda rights. “Essentially, I wasn’t allowed to make contact with anybody,” Church told The Guardian. “I had essentially figured, ‘all right, well, they disappeared us and so we’re probably never going to see the light of day again.'” An attorney who eventually gained access to the facility reportedly had to talk to Church through a “floor-to-ceiling chain-link metal cage.” But most attorneys, The Guardian notes, have been completely turned away from the site.

One detainee, John Hubbard, died in the facility, The Guardian reports. At the time, The Chicago Tribune unceremoniously reported the event under the headline “man in custody found unresponsive, dies.”

“That scares the hell out of me.”

The Guardian‘s report lands in the wake of a national conversation that began last year about police militarization in the US. Last August, the world witnessed a shocking display of force against residents of Ferguson, Missouri, who assembled to protest the killing of an unarmed teenager. Police in military battle dress rolled armored vehicles with sonic weapons down suburban streets, pointed sniper rifles at peaceful protesters, assaulted and harassed journalists, and unilaterally heightened tensions for dubious reasons. Police militarization and brutality have, of course, been an issue before Ferguson — just ask the participants of Occupy Wall Street.

As The Guardian’s report demonstrates, it’s not just weapons from the war on terror that are flowing to police departments across the country: it’s tactics and attitudes, too. “I’ve never known of any kind of organized, secret place where they go and just hold somebody before booking for hours and hours and hours,” retired DC homicide detective James Trainum told The Guardian. “That scares the hell out of me that that even exists or might exist.”

CLEVELAND – A U.S. marshal says the brother of Cleveland’s police chief has been shot to death and the girlfriend suspected of killing him has committed suicide in western Pennsylvania.

houseshooting.jpg
The brother of Cleveland’s police chief was found dead in this house on the city’s east side on Tuesday, Feb. 24, 2015
CBS affiliate WOIO

Police responding to a call found 34-year-old William D. Williams dead at a home on Cleveland’s east side early Tuesday.U.S. Marshal Pete Elliott says a homicide warrant was issued for Williams’ girlfriend, 36-year-old Dana Johnson. According to CBS Pittsburgh, she was found dead in her car along Interstate 376 in Beaver County, Pa.

Elliott says Pennsylvania troopers pulled her over a few miles across the state line, and she shot herself.

Elliott says he believes Johnson was alone in the vehicle. He says authorities suspect Johnson had been headed to Maryland, where she has relatives.

Cleveland police confirmed Williams is the brother of Chief Calvin Williams. They didn’t immediately release further details about that shooting.

Max Velocity- Mobility: Contact! All Vehicles Immobilized!

Posted: February 24, 2015 by gamegetterII in Uncategorized

From the Texas Combat Team Tactics / Mobility Class:

(Reuters) – Three Los Angeles police officers who fatally shot an unarmed man after a televised car chase in 2013 will not face charges over the killing, prosecutors said on Monday, in a case that has drawn criticism from the department’s police chief.

The news was contained in a letter dated Jan. 29 and released by the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office. It came as national scrutiny over police killings of unarmed people remains high after several high-profile deaths.

The three Los Angeles officers said they thought 51-year-old Brian Beaird, who was white, was reaching for a gun or shooting at them when they fired on him 21 times on Dec. 13, 2013.

“There is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that (the officers) did not act in self-defense and in defense of others,” the letter said.

The incident began as a car chase when Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies tried to pull Beaird over in his silver Corvette for reckless driving, police said.

After Los Angeles police officers took up pursuit, Beaird’s vehicle collided with another car at a downtown intersection and he emerged flailing his arms, police said.

An officer fired a non-lethal bean bag shotgun at Beaird. Shortly after, the three officers – Armando Corral, Leonardo Ortiz, and Michael Ayala – opened fire on him, killing him, officials said.

“I find that the tactics utilized by (the officers) substantially and unjustifiably deviated from approved department tactical training, thus requiring a finding of administrative disapproval,” Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck wrote in a report of the incident last December.

Media reported that Beaird’s family had obtained a $5 million settlement from the city over the shooting. Bill Beaird of Fresno, California, told reporters at the time he saw police shoot his son on live television.

“I’ve seen a lot, but nothing affected me like this, I just can’t seem to get over that,” he said.

The decision not to charge the officers comes as officials in Washington state are investigating the fatal shooting by three police officers of an unarmed man who was throwing rocks.

That fatal shooting prompted protests in the state’s agricultural heartland, and a lawyer for the man’s family said his constitutional rights had been violated.

(Reporting by Curtis Skinner in San Francisco)

Oregon Democrat confirms amnesty danger to gun rights

Posted: February 24, 2015 by gamegetterII in Uncategorized

Calling it the “civil rights battle” for millennials that will decide who controls the the country for the next three decades, Democrat Rep. Kurt Schrader of Oregon says immigration “will decide who is in charge of this country for the next 20 or 30 years,” the Portland Tribune reported Monday. Schraeder’s observation highlights a contention made by Gun Owners of America that amnesty is a threat to the right to keep and bear arms. That position has so far been avoided by other national gun rights groups which refuse to acknowledge the issue, or to score political ratings and endorsements accordingly.

That avoidance is in spite of the fact that Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson has stated illegal aliens have “earned the right to be citizens. It’s in spite of all credible polling showing the foreigners to be overwhelmingly Democrat and anti-gun in their sympathies.

It’s also in spite of almost daily revelations corroborating the increasing danger, and not just from the “illegal” side of the equation. Just within the past day, we’ve learned that Muslim immigration is outpacing that from Mexico and Central America, that 40 percent of New Yorkers are now foreign-born and half the residents of New York City speak a language other than English at home. We’ve also seen that the Border Patrol has been ordered to curtail deportations. Both legal and illegal immigration are being exploited by cheap labor Republicans and “earned citizenship” Democrats, both counting on the directed “cultural terraforming” to advance globalist interests and “fundamentally transform” the country.

Some gun rights advocates still offer excuses for NRA and other groups ignoring this, saying it’s not part of the “single issue.” How they arrive at that conclusion, ignoring the ultimate change in the electorate by adding millions of anti-gun voters to the rolls in coming years, is never explained, especially in light of how a “pathway to citizenship” will reverse legislative gains and assure judicial appointments are confirmed by the anti-gun majority that will result. It also contradicts NRA head Wayne LaPierre, who declared “all freedoms are connected,” but then clammed up on threats to freedom being connected, too.

Besides, in addition to that “single issue,” NRA’s bylaws, which are not optional, require directors and paid staff to “protect and defend the Constitution of the United States [and] promote public safety, law and order, and the national defense.” And we’ve seen NRA weigh in before on “tangential” issues, such as when it quite properly joined with ACLU in opposing so called “campaign finance reform” due to intolerable restrictions on the FIRST Amendment and the negative impact that would have on elections.

Gun rights leaders — and that includes bloggers — continue to ignore this issue at the peril of those who hold them in that regard. Gun owners continue to let them get away with that at their own peril. And Democrats, from Kurt Schrader of Oregon, all the way up to Barack Obama, as well as the establishment GOP and moneyed interests buying influence in both parties, are counting on the continued denial.

http://www.examiner.com/article/oregon-democrat-confirms-amnesty-danger-to-gun-rights?CID=examiner_alerts_article

He Said That? 2/24/15

Posted: February 24, 2015 by gamegetterII in Uncategorized

Robert Gore's avatarSTRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

From a question and answer session on reddit.com, from Edward Snowden:

Question (from mason dog13): What’s the best way to make NSA spying an issue in the 2016 Presidential Election? It seems like while it was a big deal in 2013, ISIS and other events have put it on the back burner for now in the media and general public. What are your ideas for how to bring it back to the forefront?

Answer (from Edward Snowden)(bold-face added): This is a good question, and there are some good traditional answers here. Organizing is important. Activism is important.

At the same time, we should remember that governments don’t often reform themselves. One of the arguments in a book I read recently (Bruce Schneier, “Data and Goliath”), is that perfect enforcement of the law sounds like a good thing, but that may not always be the case. The end of crime sounds…

View original post 538 more words

The coalition that sponsored last fall’s successful gun-purchase background-check initiative wants to intervene in a lawsuit trying to overturn the state law.
By Joseph O’Sullivan
Seattle Times Olympia bureau

Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson on Monday applauded an attempt by a coalition of gun-regulation groups to intervene against a lawsuit seeking to roll back the new law expanding background checks on gun buyers.

A lawsuit filed in December by gun-rights supporters alleges Initiative 594 violates the Second Amendment and can inadvertently criminalize people because its language is too vague. Ferguson, along with the state Attorney General’s Office and Washington State Patrol Chief John Batiste, are currently named as defendants.

On Monday, the Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility, I-594 citizen sponsor Cheryl Stumbo and the local arm of former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s Everytown for Gun Safety filed to join the defendants in the lawsuit.

“It’s my role to defend initiatives lawfully passed by the people of Washington state, and my office will do so vigorously,” Ferguson wrote in an email. “We welcome the participation of the backers of the initiative in the process.”

The move, which a judge must first approve, would allow the groups to file motions and offer a full defense of a law they campaigned hard to enact.

Approved by 59 percent of voters last November, Initiative 594 expanded background checks on gun buyers beyond the federal standard to private sales like some found online or at gun shows.

But the lawsuit lays out concerns by firearms-training groups, private security guards and inspectors, and others. Among the plaintiffs are the Northwest School of Safety; Puget Sound Security Inc.; Firearms Academy of Seattle; the Bellevue-based Second Amendment Foundation; and Alan Gottlieb, the foundation’s executive vice president.

In quick succession Monday morning, Gottlieb ticked off two reasons for gun-rights supporters to take heart with the new developments.

“I think the other side has now realized that our challenge has some very good merit to it,” he said. “The second thing is I think it shows a vote of ‘no confidence’ in the Attorney General’s Office in being able to defend.”

It is common for groups that have pushed initiatives to later become involved in the related lawsuits, according to Hugh Spitzer, acting professor of law at the University of Washington’s School of Law.

In this case, “it enables the proponents to supplement the arguments that the attorney general makes,” said Spitzer.

The development comes as gun-rights supporters have ricocheted between rallies and hearings at the Legislature, trying to find support to change or repeal I-594, or send it back to voters in a referendum.

But those bills appear to have died in the Democrat-controlled House. And a January rally at the Capitol against I-594 succeeded only in the banning of guns in the Legislature’s viewing galleries after armed demonstrators entered those areas.

Stumbo, I-594’s citizen sponsor and a survivor of the 2006 Jewish Federation shootings in Seattle, described the lawsuit as a frivolous action brought by the gun lobby.

“The same individuals who failed to weaken our state’s gun laws in last year’s election are now using the court system to do exactly that,” Stumbo said in prepared remarks.

NRA-ILA

Last Thursday, February 19, the House Committee on Judiciary passed House Bill 1857, sponsored by Laurie Jinkins (D-27), with an amendment by a narrow 7 to 6 vote.  This bill has since been referred to the House Committee on General Government and Information Technology and has been scheduled for executive action on Wednesday, February 25, at 8:00 am.

As previously reported, HB 1857 would allow a family or “household member” or police officer to apply for an order that does one thing and one thing only: deprive someone else of his or her Second Amendment rights.

Under current law, people who pose a danger to themselves or others may be dealt with in a number of ways, depending on the circumstances.  They can be arrested for a crime and subject to bail conditions or pretrial detention.  They can have a restraining order or other protective order issued against them.  They can be held for a mental health evaluation and committed to a mental institution.  Any of those things can lead to a prohibition on firearm possession under current law.  All of them require some type of judicial process, so people are not arbitrarily deprived of their liberty or their rights.

HB 1857 seeks to make the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment subject to summary judicial cancellation by allowing virtually anybody to call for the confiscation of anybody’s firearms.  No other fundamental right is subject to such infringement and HB 1857 has a high potential for abuse.  Supposed indications in the bill of what qualifies as “dangerousness” include ordinary things people have a legal right to do, including buying firearms and consuming alcohol.

It is critical that HB 1857 does not make it through the House Committee on General Government and Information Technology.  Please contact the members of this committee TODAY and urge them to oppose this bill.  Contact information for committee members is provided below:

House General Government and Information Technology Committee:

Representative Zack Hudgins (D-11), Chair
Phone: (360) 786-7956

Representative Tana Senn (D-41), Vice Chair
Phone: (360) 786-7894

Representative Drew MacEwen (R-35), Ranking Minority Member
Phone: (360) 786-7902

Representative Michelle Caldier (R-26)
Phone: (360) 786-7802

Representative Gina McCabe, (R-14)
Phone: (360) 786-7856

Representative Jeff Morris (D-40)
Phone: (360) 786-7970

Representative Dean Takko (D-19)
Phone: (360) 786-7806

NPFD 2015/1: Draft 5WH

Posted: February 24, 2015 by gamegetterII in Uncategorized