Posts Tagged ‘.gov bullshit’

Improving on the Biggest Fuck You Ever

Posted: October 26, 2016 by gamegetterII in Uncategorized
Tags: , ,

Rant time-

NSFW /Trigger warnings for all the special snowflakes…


All the dirt people who live outside of the libtard leftist infested cities voting for Trump ain’t necessarily gonna get the guy elected.
There is a better,even bigger fuck you that could be delivered-I get to it-just takes a while.

Besides that-the fact that is there is no voting our way out of this mess-there’s more illegals,libtards and dead voters in the cities.
Look at a map of how every county in FUSA voted the last couple elections-and it looks like red team is the majority in all but a few areas-the Pacific NW,NYC/NE Corridor,metro DC,Chiraq,assorted cities around the great lakes,and some other assorted blue blobs.
Problem is-the blue parts are where most of the people live-their votes count more than ours because they out number us and they don’t have a fuckin clue about how us dirt people live.

They have no clue where their food comes from-they assume it all comes from the storeroom of the local Whole Foods or whatever local price gouging organic food store they shop at.
They have no idea how to change the oil in their car-if they even own one-changing a tire for them involves calling AAA.
They’ve never had to do a damn thing for themselves.
Never shot a deer,field dressed and butchered it themselves.
Never butchered a steer or a hog,never grew their own veggies,never canned tomatoes,never shot a rifle,shotgun,or handgun.
They’ve been spoon fed leftist nonsense all their lives,all of K-12,then it got worse in college.
We have cities full of beta males,SJW’s,and the parade of sexual deviants that make up the LGBTQWERTY “movement”. I  could care less what two consenting adults do in their bedrooms,but I don’t want their way of life forced on me or my children. These people are less than 1-2% of the population,but via the leftist victim class machine-it is made to appear they are half the population.
The city women spend all of their prime child-bearing years in college,then slaving for a decade or so to pay off the student loans for college.By the time they have paid off their loans,and are ready to “settle down” they are sickened when they discover that all the “men” are abnormal beta males or sexually deviant in one way or another,and the “husband/father of their children” pool of available men is near zero.
Then they become lesbian cat ladies,or “feminists”,”animal rights” activists,or “environmentalists” or SJW’s.
If we stopped with the every kid goes to college bullshit-brought back shop classes in our schools,taught useful trades at our vocational/career center/vo-ed schools,we would have fewer beta males,fewer 40-50 year old cat lady lesbians,etc.
The PC bullshit,and the SJW’s ruining peoples lives over some bullshit that’s a perceived slight to one of the victim class has to stop-what some of them need-the beta male version-is to get their asses beat-punched straight in the mouth. No more of this crap like when the guy legally killed “Cecil the lion”,no more of this hunting is animal cruelty garbage either.
The entire globull warming/climate change scam needs to come to a full stop.
Every member of the “environmental movement”in a .gov job must be fired
No more of this crap where the enviro-nazis/”animal rights” whackos file lawsuits against the fedgov,USFWS,USFS,BLM,etc,collect legal fees,then dictate land use policies-or hunting regs,or shut down target shooting,hunting,trapping,off road vehicles,etc.
No more of these whackjobs shutting down logging on USFS or state forest lands,no more denying oil and gas drilling permits,no more war on coal,and all the “Green energy” taxpayer subsidized garbage has to stop.
NO more of this crap that a freakin’ puddle is a “navigable water of the U.S.” or a “wetland”. No more of this insanity that a plowed field is full of “mini mountain ranges”
The enviro-nazis at the EPA must all be fired-every one as of them. The agency needs to go back to dealing with actual air and water pollution-and running my damn chainsaw or riding my 4 wheeler is not “air pollution”.
The BLM needs reigned in-farmers,ranchers,hunters,fishermen and kids who ride dirt bikes have as much right to use the lands as the granola eating,Birkenstock wearing environmental-with emphasis on the mental “activists” do.

.gov SWAT  teams need disbanded-there’s no reason for the BLM,or the USFS,or the USFWS to have their own freakin SWAT team.

Nor is there any reason for every podunk town having it’s own MRAP and SWAT team.
These douchenozzles making up this crap-and those voting it into law are not normal people-they are the cloud people who live in the liberal/leftist cities.
They’ve been brainwashed for so many years,they believe that they and only they know what’s best for us dirt people-sorry,but we do not want grown ass men in the bathroom with our daughters-no matter what psychological disorder or sexual perversion they have-they do not belong in the bathrooms with our daughters-NO.

We are not the problem, nor are we the cause of the “gun violence” epidemic.

Criminals/psychopaths/sociopaths/gang-bangers/dope dealers are the problem.

No more “gun control”-none. No more. No. Over the past 40 years or so,the number of guns owned by us dirt people has increased at an astronomical rate-while “gun violence” is at an all time low.

Give up on the gun control scheme-it’s not gonna happen-no one will comply. How’s the compliance rate in Connecticut? NY State?


This would be an even bigger,better improved fuck you to those who desire to rule over us…

Us dirt people could stop all this bullshit in 3-5 DAYS-MAX.
If every carpenter,bricklayer,drywall hanger/finisher,concrete worker,steel worker,plumber,painter,landscaper,tree service worker,factory worker,hotel maid,chef,cook,waitress/waiter,store cashier,taxi driver,and especially truck driver-just refused to work for 3-5 days-this shit would stop.

The cloud people simply can not function without us.
Their world comes to a sudden stop.
Make it even better-the farmers all refuse to ship any corn,soybeans,or wheat for a week or ten days at the peak of the harvest for each crop.
The fetid,corrupt cesspools simply can not function unless us dirt people let them function.
Even if for a single day,we all stayed home-it fucks their world up.
November 9th would be a good day if the Hildebeast steals the election…


Nov. 9th is the day to start getting the pitchforks,torches,and hemp rope together.

The globalist,open borders,NWO,global governance bullshit has been planned for a hundred years or so. The Marxist/leftist/globalist crowd has been playing the long game-they’ve been playing chess while the liberty/patriot/ “III%” movement has been too busy fighting amongst themselves to accomplish anything other than lots of Molon Labe memes on Farcebook and twatter. In other words-playing checkers.

To have any chance of stopping the Hildebeast/Soros/Globalist/Leftist/Marxist/eco-enviro nazi/animal rights whacko/globull warming-climate change -( all of which are interconnected)-nonsense us dirt people simply have to fight back-tell these people NO-Instead of worrying about being called names,or having the SJW stormtroopers attack us by calling us racists,homophobes,xenophobes,Islamophobes,fascists,nazis,deplorables,rednecks,etc.etc-fight back correct them on their misconceptions-tell them they’ve been brainwashed-and tell them to fuck off-we don’t care what we are called by you mindless zombies. It’s in no way racist,or any kind of phobic to want to preserve our culture,our way of life. These people do not live in the real world,they have no clue how we live,they have no clue what decades of offshoring manufacturing jobs and importing third world illiterate laborers who are all democrat voters has done to us.

The suicide rate for us dirt people-those of us in “flyover country” has been steadily increasing since the “great recession” began,the rate of drug and alcohol addiction has skyrocketed among rural folk.

Drugs are flowing in across our porous southern border-along with violent gangs like MS-13,and thousands of illegals working for the Mexican cartels. Most of FUSA is struggling with a heroin epidemic-the influx of heroin began with the misguided invasion of Afghanistan. I’ll just leave that one there with no additional comment.
Trump is the result of lots of pissed off people who have  no say in the policies dictated by the corrupt politicians in mordor on the Potomac. The DC cesspool  is  full of wealthy leftist 1% elites-crooked politicians who come to D.C. with little money,then leave as millionaires,then go on to a “consulting” or lobbying job at one of the companies they passed bills to benefit. The wealthy leftists and the uniparty GOP-Dem politicians working together to rule us from mordor on the Potomac are the problem.

Taxation without representation was part of the reason the revolutionary war -leftist rule by importing third world people who hate us will be part of the reason the next revolutionary war is fought-unless the leftists win by filling the cities with third world vermin who vote leftist,which makes all of the dirt people’s votes null and void because of the electoral college giving the cities more say so in how we are ruled.

As this happens-and it’s already happening-look at a map of the FUSA county by county vote and you’ll see it clearly-the police state,the surviellance state,and the regulatory state will grow exponentially. The insane number of laws will increase,many of them labeling us “domestic terrorists”,the number of “hate speech” laws will increase-one only has to look at the crap taking place in Europe-where politcians and citizens alike are charged with “hate speech” for pointing out that the invasion of fake refugees is hurting their cities/countries.

It’s way past time to improve on the biggest fuck you the world has ever seen
If it’s not done-the left will succeed with their century old plan to rule over all of us-those who know what that will be like want no part of it-yet it is being force-fed to us at  an increasing rate.

Anyone got a better idea-short of armed revolt? (at least for now)


Yahoo Inc last year secretly built a custom software program to search all of its customers’ incoming emails for specific information provided by U.S. intelligence officials, according to people familiar with the matter.

The company complied with a classified U.S. government demand, scanning hundreds of millions of Yahoo Mail accounts at the behest of the National Security Agency or FBI, said three former employees and a fourth person apprised of the events.

Some surveillance experts said this represents the first case to surface of a U.S. Internet company agreeing to an intelligence agency’s request by searching all arriving messages, as opposed to examining stored messages or scanning a small number of accounts in real time.

It is not known what information intelligence officials were looking for, only that they wanted Yahoo to search for a set of characters. That could mean a phrase in an email or an attachment, said the sources, who did not want to be identified

Reuters was unable to determine what data Yahoo may have handed over, if any, and if intelligence officials had approached other email providers besides Yahoo with this kind of request.

According to two of the former employees, Yahoo Chief Executive Marissa Mayer’s decision to obey the directive roiled some senior executives and led to the June 2015 departure of Chief Information Security Officer Alex Stamos, who now holds the top security job at Facebook Inc.

“Yahoo is a law abiding company, and complies with the laws of the United States,” the company said in a brief statement in response to Reuters questions about the demand. Yahoo declined any further comment.

Through a Facebook spokesman, Stamos declined a request for an interview.

The NSA referred questions to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which declined to comment.

The request to search Yahoo Mail accounts came in the form of a classified edict sent to the company’s legal team, according to the three people familiar with the matter.

U.S. phone and Internet companies are known to have handed over bulk customer data to intelligence agencies. But some former government officials and private surveillance experts said they had not previously seen either such a broad demand for real-time Web collection or one that required the creation of a new computer program.

“I’ve never seen that, a wiretap in real time on a ‘selector,'” said Albert Gidari, a lawyer who represented phone and Internet companies on surveillance issues for 20 years before moving to Stanford University this year. A selector refers to a type of search term used to zero in on specific information.

“It would be really difficult for a provider to do that,” he added.

Experts said it was likely that the NSA or FBI had approached other Internet companies with the same demand, since they evidently did not know what email accounts were being used by the target. The NSA usually makes requests for domestic surveillance through the FBI, so it is hard to know which agency is seeking the information.

Alphabet Inc’s Google and Microsoft Corp, two major U.S. email service providers, separately said on Tuesday that they had not conducted such email searches.

“We’ve never received such a request, but if we did, our response would be simple: ‘No way’,” a spokesman for Google said in a statement.

A Microsoft spokesperson said in a statement, “We have never engaged in the secret scanning of email traffic like what has been reported today about Yahoo.” The company declined to comment on whether it had received such a request.


Under laws including the 2008 amendments to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, intelligence agencies can ask U.S. phone and Internet companies to provide customer data to aid foreign intelligence-gathering efforts for a variety of reasons, including prevention of terrorist attacks.

Disclosures by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden and others have exposed the extent of electronic surveillance and led U.S. authorities to modestly scale back some of the programs, in part to protect privacy rights.

Companies including Yahoo have challenged some classified surveillance before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, a secret tribunal.

Some FISA experts said Yahoo could have tried to fight last year’s demand on at least two grounds: the breadth of the directive and the necessity of writing a special program to search all customers’ emails in transit.

Apple Inc made a similar argument earlier this year when it refused to create a special program to break into an encrypted iPhone used in the 2015 San Bernardino massacre. The FBI dropped the case after it unlocked the phone with the help of a third party, so no precedent was set.

“It is deeply disappointing that Yahoo declined to challenge this sweeping surveillance order, because customers are counting on technology companies to stand up to novel spying demands in court,” Patrick Toomey, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement.

Some FISA experts defended Yahoo’s decision to comply, saying nothing prohibited the surveillance court from ordering a search for a specific term instead of a specific account. So-called “upstream” bulk collection from phone carriers based on content was found to be legal, they said, and the same logic could apply to Web companies’ mail.

As tech companies become better at encrypting data, they are likely to face more such requests from spy agencies.

Former NSA General Counsel Stewart Baker said email providers “have the power to encrypt it all, and with that comes added responsibility to do some of the work that had been done by the intelligence agencies.”


Mayer and other executives ultimately decided to comply with the directive last year rather than fight it, in part because they thought they would lose, said the people familiar with the matter.

Yahoo in 2007 had fought a FISA demand that it conduct searches on specific email accounts without a court-approved warrant. Details of the case remain sealed, but a partially redacted published opinion showed Yahoo’s challenge was unsuccessful.

Some Yahoo employees were upset about the decision not to contest the more recent edict and thought the company could have prevailed, the sources said.

They were also upset that Mayer and Yahoo General Counsel Ron Bell did not involve the company’s security team in the process, instead asking Yahoo’s email engineers to write a program to siphon off messages containing the character string the spies sought and store them for remote retrieval, according to the sources.

The sources said the program was discovered by Yahoo’s security team in May 2015, within weeks of its installation. The security team initially thought hackers had broken in.

When Stamos found out that Mayer had authorized the program, he resigned as chief information security officer and told his subordinates that he had been left out of a decision that hurt users’ security, the sources said. Due to a programming flaw, he told them hackers could have accessed the stored emails.

Stamos’s announcement in June 2015 that he had joined Facebook did not mention any problems with Yahoo. (

In a separate incident, Yahoo last month said “state-sponsored” hackers had gained access to 500 million customer accounts in 2014. The revelations have brought new scrutiny to Yahoo’s security practices as the company tries to complete a deal to sell its core business to Verizon Communications Inc for $4.8 billion.

(Reporting by Joseph Menn; Editing by Jonathan Weber and Tiffany Wu)



Federal government lists are vulnerable to inaccuracy, and misuse by politicians to push political agendas. The proposal to use the no-fly list as the basis for stripping U.S. citizens of constitutional rights is a case in point. Regardless of one’s position on gun control, using a secret government process to tinker with the Bill of Rights is wrong, and very dangerous.

“What could possibly be the argument for allowing a terrorist suspect to buy a semi-automatic weapon?” President Obama recently asked, suggesting falsely the no-fly list is a list of known terrorists, inferring that using it would have made a difference in San Bernardino, although the names of neither of the San Bernardino terrorists appeared on it. In his exploitation of yet another terrible gun tragedy, the president has created a false argument, politician-speak, internally consistent, but based on untruths. Who indeed would argue for allowing terrorists to buy semi-automatic weapons?

The problem is not people the president would have you believe want terrorists to have guns, but politicians, lacking imagination, who want to use a flawed, unreliable, secret government process to brand U.S. citizens as terrorists, without a court hearing, and then deny them their constitutional rights.

The no-fly list is demonstrably inaccurate, a product of subjective decision-making, using the lowest possible legal standard of proof, to identify people “reasonably suspected to have engaged in terrorism or related activities.” The courts recognize the standard, but it is not enough to arrest or indict anyone, or even get a search warrant, much less a criminal conviction. It’s best described as gut instinct, the kind that allows a police officer who sees something not quite right to stop people briefly, and question them about what’s going on. The president would use gut instinct to tinker with fundamental freedoms.

There is no shortage of stories about Americans wronged by the no-fly list: children under 5, a Marine returning from Iraq, a brigadier general, Sen. Ted Kennedy, Rep. John Lewis, Rep. John Young, reputable journalists, outspoken political figures, the list goes on and on. In some cases, the mistake is so egregious that it helps the victim to muscle their way through an opaque bureaucracy to get off the list, but that is not true for most folks. For them, redress is virtually nonexistent, a fact recognized as a violation of the Constitution by at least two federal courts. A classified government document, leaked in 2014, showed that about 40 percent of people on the watch list had “no recognized terrorist group affiliation.” This is the president’s list of “terrorist suspects.”

Read more @ The Washington Times here


SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Crystal Patterson didn’t have the cash or assets to post $150,000 bail and get out of jail after her arrest for assault in October.

So Patterson, 39, promised to pay a bail bonds company $15,000 plus interest to put up the $150,000 bail for her, allowing to go home and care for her invalid grandmother.

The day after her release, the district attorney decided not to pursue charges. But Patterson still owes the bail bonds company. Criminal justice reformers and lawyers at a nonprofit Washington, D.C., legal clinic say that is unconstitutionally unfair.

The lawyers have filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of Patterson, Rianna Buffin and other jail inmates who argue that San Francisco and California’s bail system unconstitutionally treats poor and wealthy suspects differently.

Wealthy suspects can put up their houses or other valuable assets — or simply write a check — to post bail and stay out of jail until their cases are resolved. Poorer suspects aren’t so lucky. Many remain behind bars or pay nonrefundable fees to bail bonds companies.

San Francisco public defender Chesa Boudin says some of his clients who can’t afford to post bail plead guilty to minor charges for crimes they didn’t commit so they can leave jail.

Boudin represented Buffin, 19, after her arrest for grand theft in October. Buffin couldn’t afford to post the $30,000 bail or pay a bond company a $3,000 fee and so contemplated pleading guilty in exchange for a quick release from jail even though she says her only crime was being with the “wrong people at the wrong place at the wrong time.”

Fortunately, the district attorney declined to charge Buffin and she was released after being held for three days.

“My family was worried,” said Ruffin, who lost her $10.50 an hour baggage handler job at the Oakland International Airport after her arrest.

The lawsuit filed by the Equal Justice Under Law in San Francisco federal court in October seeks to abolish the cash bail system in the city, state — and the country. It’s the ninth lawsuit the center has filed in seven states.

“The bail system in most states is a two-tiered system,” said center founder Phil Telfeyan. “One for the wealthy and one for everyone else.”

The center has settled four lawsuits, convincing smaller jails in states in the South to do away with cash bail requirements for most charges.

Telfeyan said a win in California could add momentum to the center’s goal to rid the country of the cash bail system, which the lawyers say is used by most county jails in all 50 states. The federal system usually allows non-violent suspects free without bail pending trial and denies bail to serious and violent suspects.

“The country watches what happens in California,” said Telfeyan, a former Department of Justice attorney who founded the Washington organization in 2013 with a partner and the first-ever grant from the Harvard Law School Public Service Venture Fund in 2013.

Telfeyan said it’s not his goal to put out of business the classic neon-advertising bail bonding industry, but conceded the business model would become obsolete if he convinces courts that the cash bail system is unconstitutional.

The industry didn’t acknowledge Telfeyan’s first lawsuits filed earlier this year.

But on Monday, lawyers for the California Bail Agents Association filed court papers seeking to formally oppose the San Francisco lawsuit. The association argues that government lawyers for San Francisco and the state are offering only “tepid” opposition to the California lawsuit.

San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi argues that most jail inmates are awaiting resolution of minor, non-violent crimes and that letting them free while awaiting court hearings will save the city millions of dollars. Mirkarimi said non-violent suspects can be monitored electronically and with frequent visits from law enforcement officials to ensure they don’t flee the area and attend all their court hearings.

In January, Telfeyan and his colleagues from Equal Justice Under Law will ask a judge to temporarily suspend San Francisco’s cash bail system until the lawsuit is resolved. Telfeyan said a victory in San Francisco and the elimination of cash bail in the city will most likely lead to the abolition of cash bail in all of the state’s 58 counties.

Maggie Kreins, who is president of bail agents group, the says the longtime system of putting up money or an insurance-backed bail bond is better at getting people to show up in court and it saves the public costs of monitoring defendants or hunting down bail jumpers.

Kreins said that California’s “bail schedule” could be reformed to lower bail amounts for minor crimes, but that scrapping the system completely would be a mistake.

“What is the incentive to go to court if you don’t lose anything for failing to appear?” Kreins said.