Posts Tagged ‘firearms.gun laws’

Attorney General Eric Holder and ATF Director B. Todd Jones have been named defendants in a lawsuit seeking to overturn the federal machine gun ban.
Attorney General Eric Holder and ATF Director B. Todd Jones have been named defendants in a lawsuit seeking to overturn the federal machine gun ban.
Photo by Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images

A complaint for declarative and injunctive relief was filed Thursday in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division. Plaintiff Jay Aubrey Isaac Hollis, acting individually and as trustee of a revocable living trust, is suing Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Director B. Todd Jones in their official capacities for administering, executing and enforcing “statutory and regulatory provisions [that] generally act as an unlawful de facto ban on the transfer or possession of a machine gun manufactured after May 19, 1986.

“By imposing such a ban on an entire class of weapons, the statutes and regulations exceed the power of the United States,” the complaint states. It makes its case by citing violations of Article I of the United States Constitution, the Second, Ninth and Tenth Amendments, and “principles of federalism and dual sovereignty.

“[B]y arbitrarily ‘disapproving’ an already approved Form 1, Defendants’ actions violate Plaintiff’s Fifth Amendment right to due process and is an unjust taking; and violate the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,” the complaint continues. “Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against … unconstitutional provisions … declaring the ban on machine guns unconstitutional … and declaratory and injunctive relief prohibiting Defendants from unjustly taking property without Due Process.

http://www.examiner.com/article/lawsuit-challenges-federal-machine-gun-ban?CID=examiner_alerts_article

A variety of gun bills are being shot out at the statehouse, all of them ready to be debated by lawmakers after the election next Tuesday.

Mike Weinman from the Ohio Fraternal Order of Police says law enforcement dislikes many of the proposed gun bills, beginning with an Ohio version of Stand Your Ground.

“You’re going to have questions come up in your head when you’re reading these bills so ask those questions,” said Weinman.  “What you don’t want is lethal force being the first and only force being used and that’s pretty much the fear in stand your ground laws.”

Stand Your Ground is just one of 14 bills – at last count – that would expand access to guns in Ohio.

One bill would eliminate most requirements for carrying a concealed weapon, while another would allow guns in the classroom.  A third would recognize concealed carry permits from other states.

“We shouldn’t have the legislature in the state of Indiana determining who carries a gun in Ohio,” said Weinman.

But Ken Hanson from the Buckeye Firearms Association says all of this worry is overblown.

“My goodness when we changed carry in the car, people were going to be twirling guns on their fingers,” said Hanson.  “Well we can carry guns in restaurants and now people will be drinking beers and shooting each other. None of it every comes true.”

Hanson says despite objections from the Fraternal Order of Police, each gun bill will have its day at the statehouse.

“I’ve called it an embarrassment of riches. we have a lot of gun bills,” said Hanson.

http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2014/10/27/columbus-ohio-over-a-dozen-gun-bills-await-lawmakers-after-election.html

Moms Demand Action is today promoting this meme:

“On the outfit’s Facebook page, the image is furnished with a caption:

Dmitry Smirnov was prohibited from purchasing firearms because he wasn’t a U.S. citizen. But he was able to buy a handgun from a stranger online at Armslist.com with no questions asked. Less than two weeks later, Smirnov traveled to Chicago and murdered his ex-girlfriend, who he had been stalking. He shot her a dozen times

This is astoundingly, willfully, egregiously dishonest. Every single thing that Dmitry Smirnov did was already flatly illegal. He didn’t utilize any “loopholes”; he didn’t benefit from any ambiguities or exceptions in the law; he wasn’t freed up by a lack of “common sense” prohibitions. He just broke the existing rules.

Let’s go through this methodically:…”

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/390356/another-brazen-lie-moms-demand-action-charles-c-w-cooke

Mark Kelly,not only is he using his injured wife-former congress woman Gabby Giffords- as a stage prop,he is lying on national TV…

“Mark Kelly lied on national television about how many such transactions occur without a background check.  Asked by CNN, Kelly said (at 3:30 in the video), “right now 60 percent of all gun sales go–occur–with a background check.  Why do we allow the 40 percent, the other 40 percent, to happen?” ”

Shannon watts from moms demand action,Obama,and Bloomberg all repeat this same lie.

Even the left-leaning Washington Post gives that claim 3 pinocchios.

Kelly,Bloomberg,and Bill gates are trying to buy a gun control law in Washington state…

“However, what Kelly, Giffords, Bloomberg, Watts and Obama are trying to do is not a joking matter.  They are trying to deceive the public into supporting something that they know couldn’t possibly prevent criminals from getting guns, but that could pave the way for worse gun control restrictions in the future.”

http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/articles/2014/10/mark-kelly-lies-about-gun-sales-before-i-594-vote.aspx

‘Badass’ Moms Take Gun Fight To NRA’s Home Turf

Okay,gotta admit I was laughing too hard at the headline to start reading the following nonsense for a minute or three…

“The next contender in the fight to knock the most feared lobbying association in the United States off its powerful perch is a 43-year-old former stay-at-home mother from suburban Indianapolis named Shannon Watts.”

BWAAHAhahahahahahaha-you gotta be kiddin me !

“With access to Michael Bloomberg’s deep pockets and the force of more than 2 million dedicated supporters, Watts in recent months convinced the CEOs of several major U.S. companies to take a stand against guns in their stores and restaurants. Her group helped get laws passed in a few states that make it harder for perpetrators of domestic violence to get firearms.”

The truth is most of the stores did not ban guns,Panera stated they will follow state and local laws,Starbucks just asked patrons to not come in their stores when open carrying,and stated they will continue to serve all customers as long as they are following state and local laws,Kroger told them to piss off.

As usual the anti-gun zealot author uses lies,half-truths and obfuscation to prove a point that doesn’t even exist-moms’ effect on carrying legally owned and carried firearms in stores had exactly one success-Target.

“It makes our moms feel like badasses to take on the most powerful lobbying organization in the country,” Watts told The Huffington Post last week.

Bwaaahaaahahahahahah-you gota be kiddin’ me-what planet is this twit from?

“The new push comes after the group lost some big fights to the NRA in confrontations that underscore the limits of the moms’ brand of volunteer-led grassroots activism — especially at the state level, where entrenched gun lobbyists have an outsized voice.”

Stop-you’re killin’ me-lost “some” big fights?! Lost every single one is the truthful description.

“volunteer-led grassroots activism” bwahahahahah-stop-my sides hurt from laughing so hard!

Since when does Bloomberg’s $$$$ = “grassroots activism”?

Read the rest of this drivel if you can stand it…

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/23/shannon-watts-moms-demand-action_n_5863346.html

And Then They Came For The Bolt-Actions

Posted: September 19, 2014 by gamegetterII in firearms, gun laws, hunting
Tags: , ,

The anti-gun zealots are doing exactly what many of us predicted they would do,going after bolt-action hunting rifles,calling them “sniper rifles”,and claiming owners of these rifles are insurrectionists or terrorists-or both…

“You can find them in every gun store in even the most restrictive states in the nation, and with good reason; bolt-action rifles are among the most ubiquitous rifles in the United States, and have been in deer camps and military arsenals in the United States since the Palmer carbine was used in the U.S. Civil War.

Now two separate gun control groups are attempting to restrict access to them.”

“Now both the National Gun Victims Action Council (NGVAC) and Cease Fire PA are calling for additional restrictions for bolt-action rifles.”

Elliot Fineman, the histrionics-prone CEO of NGVAC, has dubbed the most technologically advanced bolt-action rifle in the world, the TrackingPoint PGF (Precision-Guided Firearm), a firearm suitable only for terrorists:

http://bearingarms.com/came-bolt-actions/?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Just to make it an official anti-gun display of histrionic idiocy,it comes complete with a claim that’s an outright lie,proven to be a lie in under 3 minutes of research online.

“Police say a gunman used a .308-caliber rifle to shoot two state troopers, one fatally, on Friday.

Today, Cease Fire PA called for tougher background checks on weapons just like it in the capitol rotunda. The group, made up of mayors and activists from across the Commonwealth, called for expanded background checks on people buying long guns, such as rifles and shot guns.

Cease Fire says FBI figures show the number of murders committed with long guns has doubled since 1996.”

“According to the FBI, long guns accounted for 622 murders in 2012 (322 rifles, 303 shotguns), and 1,205 in 1996 (532 rifles, 673 shotguns, according to Table 20). The number of people murdered with long guns hasn’t doubled… it has roughly halved.”

From David Codrea via Florida carry
FIREARMS SAFETY COUNSELING REPRESENTATION: PHYSICIAN QUALIFICATIONS AND LIABILITY
 
Part One: Qualifications
I affirm that I am certified to offer (Name of Patient: ), herineafter referred to as “the Patient”, qualified advice about firearms safety in the home, having received: Specify Course(s) of Study:  _________________________________________________________________________ from: Specify Institution(s)  _________________________________________________________________________ on: Specify Course Completion Date(s):  _________________________________________________________________________ resulting in: Specify Accreditation(s), Certification(s), License(s) etc.:  _________________________________________________________________________  _________________________________________________________________________
Check one, as appropriate:
 ___
I represent that I have reviewed applicable scientific literature pertaining to defensive gun use and beneficial results of private firearms ownership. I further represent that I have reviewed all other relevant home safety issues with the Patient, including those relating to electricity, drains, disposals, compactors, garage doors, driveway safety, pool safety, pool fence codes and special locks for pool gates, auto safety, gas, broken glass, stored cleaning chemicals, buckets, toilets, sharp objects, garden tools, home tools, power tools, lawnmowers, lawn chemicals, scissors, needles, forks, knives, etc. I also acknowledge, by receiving this document, I have been made aware that, in his inaugural address before the American Medical Association on June 20, 2001, new president Richard Corlin, MD, admitted “What we don’t know about violence and guns is literally killing us…researchers do not have the data to tell how kids get guns, if trigger locks work, what the warning signs of violence in schools and at the workplace are and other critical questions due to lack of research funding.” (UPI). In spite of this admission, I represent that I have sufficient data and expertise to provide expert and clinically sound advice to patients regarding firearms in the home.
OR 
  ___
I am knowingly engaging in Home/Firearms Safety Counseling without certification, license or formal training in Risk Management, and; I have
not
 reviewed applicable scientific literature pertaining to defensive gun use and beneficial results of private firearms ownership.
 
Part Two: Liability
I have determined, from a review of my medical malpractice insurance, that if I engage in an activity for which I am not certified, such as Firearms Safety Counseling, the carrier (check one, as appropriate):  ___ will  ___ will not cover lawsuits resulting from neglect, lack of qualification, etc. Insurance Carrier name, address and policy number insuring me for firearms safety expertise:  _________________________________________________________________________
I further warrant that, should the Patient follow my firearm safety counseling and remove from the home and/or disable firearms with trigger locks or other mechanisms, and if the patient or a family member, friend or visitor is subsequently injured or killed as a result of said removal or disabling, that my malpractice insurance and/or personal assets will cover all actual and punitive damages resulting from a lawsuit initiated by the patient, the patient’s legal reprerentative, or the patient’s survivors.
Signature of attesting physician and date: __________________________________________________ Name of attesting physician (please print):__________________________________________________ Signature of patient and date: ____________________________________________________________ Name of patient (please print):____________________________________________________________
Patient:
 Indicate if physician “REFUSED TO SIGN.” Have physician place a copy in your chart/medical record

“The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence is filing a lawsuit against online retailers that allegedly sold ammunition to James Holmes, the suspect accused of the Aurora theater killings.”

“The lawsuit alleges that the websites negligently supplied Holmes with the arsenal he used to kill 12 people and wound at least 58 others by failing to use any screening mechanism to determine his identity or intent for the products,”

Let’s see-what possible intent does anyone have when they buy ammo?
Wow-they are going to shoot said ammo out of a firearm of whatever caliber ammo they purchased.
What kind of idiotic lawyer would even bother to file such nonsense?
The Brady bunch should be fined for filing frivolous lawsuits,have to pay for the attorney fees for the ammo companies,have to pay all court costs,and have to purchase full page ads in every major newspaper admitting that they filed such an idiotic lawsuit,along with 60 second TV and radio ads stating the same thing.
Freakin’ morons. I can see what they are trying to do-they want to make mandatory background checks for ammo purchases.
Even Commiefornia refused to allow such a bill to pass.

Here’s the article about said nonsense-read it if you can do so without either puking, tossing your laptop across the room, or throwing the monitor for your desktop computer on the floor…

Limits on Doctors: Guns in Home Not Relevant

Posted: September 15, 2014 by gamegetterII in gun laws
Tags:

“Picture this: You’ve never been arrested for anything. You don’t even have a

speeding ticket or accident on your record. You’ve never had to call the police or appear in court, other than to serve as a juror. You are the model citizen.

Now add this to the picture you’re painting: You take your 8-year-old daughter to the pediatrician for a routine physical. Nothing’s wrong. Nothing’s happened.

Just routine stuff: Check height and weight. Look down the throat and in the ears. Poke a little here and prod a little there.

And then, to you: Do you have any guns in your house? Guns? What does that have to do with my child’s health? you wonder.”

The most important paragraph…

“Violation of the Firearm Owners’ Privacy Act could trigger penalties ranging from fines to revocation of a doctor’s license to practice.”

http://www.theledger.com/article/20140913/EDIT01/140919746/1036/edit03?p=all&tc=pgall

It’s the Politics, Stupid

Posted: September 9, 2014 by gamegetterII in firearms
Tags: ,

“When the same groups constantly squawking about “protecting the children” when the subject is making firearms illegal, refuse to OK a good idea specifically designed to protect children, you can clearly see their use of the word “protect” as a synonym for the word “disarm”.

The latest manifestation of this curious behavior is a decision by officials at Reagan National Airport not to permit the display of Project ChildSafe’s “Own It? Respect it. Secure it.” billboard. It is, FYI, the same sign you can see displayed in other airports, including Hartford-Springfield, Las Vegas, Little Rock, Providence and St. Louis .”

http://www.theoutdoorwire.com/features/229124